Sabarimala Hearing: How Courts Balance Religious Freedom and Constitutional Regulation
During arguments in the Sabarimala hearings comparative constitutional jurisprudence from the European Union Court of Justice and the House of Lords was
Sabarimala
Sabarimala Temple Entry Review Explained: Can Non-Believers Enter Places of Worship?
On Day 9 of the Sabarimala review hearing, Advocate Nizam Pasha argued that reducing religious rights under Articles 25 and 26 to
From Temple Entry to Constitutional Doctrine: The Expanding Questions in the Sabarimala Case
A nine-judge Constitution Bench hearing to decide the correctness of Indian Young Lawyers Association vs The State Of Kerala, (2019) 11 SCC
Kerala High Court orders immediate action against widespread sale of unlabelled KumKum in Erumeli; issues directives
The Court held that the sale of unlabelled, unpackaged, and untested KumKum constitutes a breach of mandatory statutory requirements, and immediate regulatory intervention was warranted.
Kerala High Court’s comprehensive directions for crowd management at Sabarimala during Mandala-Makaravilakku festival
The directions are to be complied in letter, spirit, and execution, as they are indispensable to regulating the inbound flow of pilgrims and paramount for safeguarding the life, health and safety of every devotee visiting Sannidhanam and the Sanctity of the Holy Temple.
Kerala HC Directs Collector and Police to ensure safe pilgrimage to Sabarimala during Mandala-Makaravilakku Festival
Kerala High Court was reviewing the steps and action plans proposed by the Travancore Devaswom Board, the State Government, and the police to ensure the safety and security of pilgrims at Sabarimala.
2020 Roundup: 11 Constitution bench judgments, 17 judges, Zero dissent
♦ Did you know? In the year 2020, All the Constitution bench verdicts were unanimous with no dissenting opinion. 9 out of
Sabarimala| Questions of law can be referred to larger bench while hearing a review petition; Issues framed
Supreme Court: The 9-judge bench of SA Bobde, CJ and R Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan, L Nageswara Rao, M M Shantanagoudar, S A
Sabarimala| 9-judge bench reserves order on whether a reference can be made in a review petition
Supreme Court: The 9-judge bench of SA Bobde, CJ and R Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan, L Nageswara Rao, M M Shantanagoudar, S A
Sabarimala| Can reference be made in a review petition?9-judge bench to decide along with other issues
Supreme Court: A nine-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court will hear on February 6 argument on the issue whether the court
Sabarimala| SG tells the Court that issues can be framed in chambers; SC to hear the matter on Thursday
Supreme Court: The nine-judge bench of Supreme Court will hear the Sabarimala matter again on Thursday after hearing the matter today. Solicitor
Sabarimala| Hearing before the 9-judge bench to conclude in 10 days
Supreme Court: A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by CJI Sharad Arvind Bobde has fixed a 10-day period for concluding
Sabarimala| 9-judge bench to start hearing the matter from January 13
Supreme Court: A nine-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde will hear from January 13 the issue of allowing
Sabarimala Review Petitions NOT referred to a larger bench, but kept pending. Here’s what Supreme Court has actually held
Supreme Court: The 5-judge Constitution Bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and RF Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, JJ has
Supreme Court to pronounce verdicts in Rafale & Sabarimala Review petitions tomorrow
Supreme Court: Adding to the series of important rulings that are being passed before CJI Ranjan Gogoi retires, the Court is to
Ker HC | Anticipatory bail granted to a politician involved in protests against entry of women in Sabarimala
Kerala High Court: The Bench of Sunil Thomas, J. allowed the bail application filed by a member of a political party involved
Sabarimala Verdict review: Judgment Reserved
Supreme Court: The 5-judge Constitution Bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and RF Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, JJ has
Here’s why Sabarimala Review hearing may not begin from Jan 22
Supreme Court: The Court said that it may not start the hearing on pleas seeking review of the Sabarimala verdict from January 22
Sabarimala| Activist denied anticipatory bail holding her Facebook posts to have the propensity of wounding religious feelings of Ayyappa devotees
Kerala High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Sunil Thomas, J. dismissed the anticipatory bail plea of activist Rehna Fathima who