S. 3 Judges (Inquiry) Act 1st proviso doesn’t negate individual authority of Parliament; Art. 32 remedy confined only to fundamental rights enforcement: SC
“Constitutional safeguards for Judges cannot come at the cost of paralysing the removal process itself. The first proviso must, therefore, be construed to balance prescribed protection with the effective functioning of the mechanism for removal of a Judge from office triggered by the peoples’ representatives, and not to frustrate it altogether.”