Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Perusal of the impugned orders indicates that it is apparently a non-speaking and unreasoned order and it nowhere mentions as to how the petitioner was responsible for the result being lower than the standard norms fixed by the respondents.”

Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the instant matter, the retired employees and pensioners challenged the period for the restoration of full pension under Rule 29 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1996.