Admissibility of electronic evidence
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“The case of the Revenue, which is based on documents retrieved from CPUs, computers or pen drives and various statements recorded during the course of investigation, which have been found to be inadmissible as evidence, to allege clandestine removal of goods, cannot be sustained.”

Advocate-client privilege
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court upholds search under S. 67(2), Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, subject to protection of privileged and third-party confidential material.

DomesticEvents & CollaborationsIndia Digital ADR Summit

At the India Digital ADR Summit 2026, Justice M R Shah, Justice Rajesh Bindal, Justice Soniaben Gokani and leading arbitration professionals discussed the need for a coordinated digital ADR framework, safeguards for human judgment, common cybersecurity standards, institutional control over technology and India’s potential to contribute to international rule-making.

teacher-student POCSO case
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Material contradictions, significant omissions, and the complete absence of the alleged photographs, videos, messages, and call records persuades the Bombay High Court to suspend the sentence in a POCSO conviction, holding that the prosecution case raised serious issues requiring appellate scrutiny and that the evidence disclosed chances of acquittal pending appeal.

SCC Times NewsflashWATCH NOW

The Supreme Court examined whether a husband’s adultery allegations against his wife, supported by photographs and videos, could justify denial of interim

private investigator evidence law
Case BriefsSupreme Court

While deciding a matrimonial maintenance dispute where a husband presented videos and photographs obtained from a private investigator before the trial court to prove his wife’s adultery, the Court expressed massive concerns over breach of privacy, proper authorisation thereby highlighting engagement of private investigators as “an area sans regulation”.

electronic evidence admissibility
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court clarified that the Madras High Court’s view in R. v. B., (2024) 1 HCC (Mad) 531, requiring Part B to be signed exclusively by Section 79-A-notified Examiner of Electronic Evidence shall not operate as a binding precedent.

Section 138-C electronic evidence
Experts CornerLakshmikumaran & Sridharan

by Rachit Jain*, Harshdeep Khurana** and Dhanur Gupta***

mere recovery of tainted money insufficient for conviction
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Offences under the PC Act require strict proof of twin elements of demand and acceptance and mere recovery of tainted currency or existence of electronic recordings, without reliable proof of demand, is insufficient to convict unless accompanied by credible proof of demand.”

State Legislation Roundup
Legal RoundUpLegislation Roundup

Explore key legal and policy developments across Indian states from July to September 2025. Covering reforms in education, taxation, labor welfare, and clean energy, this roundup reflects India’s growing momentum toward transparent, technology-enabled, and citizen-first governance.

Section 65-B certificate
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the case at hand, the video was recorded in someone’s device and transferred to the device of the respondent who had submitted the certificate.

electronic evidence and video conferencing
Legislation UpdatesNotifications

Delhi’s legal system reinforces efficiency and judicial integrity through digital proceedings under Electronic Evidence and Video Conferencing Rules 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Merely admitting evidence on record is not proof of a fact-in-issue or a relevant fact… Admitting evidence is mere inclusion of evidence in record, to be assessed on a comprehensive set of factors, parameters and aspects, in the discretion of the court.”

Electronic Evidence in Focus
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Divyansha Goswami†

WhatsApp Chats Inadmissible Evidence
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner presented a screenshot of WhatsApp conversations to show that the full complaint and annexures were not received until 31-01-2023, despite the summons being served on 23-12-2022.

Rouse Avenue
Case BriefsDistrict Court

Quality and relevancy; and not quantity of evidence, is what determines the fate of a case.

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Dhruva Gandhi† and Nikita Garg††

'Lex Mercatoria' by Hasit SethExperts Corner

by Hasit B. Seth †

Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 42

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of Prasanna B. Varale and S.M. Modak, JJ., while addressing the present matter expressed that:  “…relationship

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Vikas Upadhyay* &  Prakash Upadhyay **