Del HC | Can a party unilaterally appoint an Arbitrator of their choice? Read on
Delhi High Court: Suresh Kumar Kait, J., reiterated that no party could be permitted to unilaterally appoint an Arbitrator, as the same
Delhi High Court: Suresh Kumar Kait, J., reiterated that no party could be permitted to unilaterally appoint an Arbitrator, as the same
by Ajit Warrier†, Arundhati Srivastava†† and Sajal Mendiratta†††
Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 63
Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta, JJ., while addressing the present matter, remarked that: Fate of
by Kumar Sumit* and Avani Tiwari**
Supreme Court: The bench of Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy*, JJ has held that the Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable to
Supreme Court: The bench of Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy*, JJ has held that the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development
Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J., refused to interfere in the interim arbitral award whereby the sole arbitrator had allowed certain claims of
Delhi High Court: V. Kameswar Rao, J., refused to interfere with the award passed by the Arbitrator and dismissed a petition filed under
By Nikhil Parakh* and Sejal Makkad**
by Arush Agarwal† and Bhavya Gupta††
Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J., decides a matter covering various aspects of the arbitration agreement. Instant petition under Section 11 of
by Hiroo Advani† and Manav Nagpal††
Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 40
by Hiroo Advani†, Tariq Khan†† and Mahi Mehta †††
Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 39
by Divyanshu Srivastava*
by Abhinay Sharma† and Lakshmi Subramaniam Iyer††
by Hiroo Advani† and Chaiti Desai††
Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 45