Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The applicant must have spent considerable resources fighting the suit for the last 20 years and therefore, it would not be appropriate to deprive him of the opportunity to execute the decree obtained in his favour.

S. 34 Arbitration Act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court requested the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court to assign the hearing of the petition under Section 34 to a Judge other than the Judge who heard and passed the impugned order.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Decisions along with the speaking orders passed by the Foreigners Regional Registration Office to reject the OCI applications of the Russian nationals were quashed.

Criminal Law Monthly Roundup July 2024
Legal RoundUpTopic-wise Roundup

Read July’s share of criminal law discussions at the Supreme Court and various High Courts

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi Police was directed to file an updated status report of the missing woman based on updated Aadhar card information.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Court said the Family Court judge was correct in holding that divorce petition could not be rejected merely because a part of the cause of action was not viable in law if the Court otherwise had jurisdiction to entertain the action, and therefore, the application under Order 7 Rule 11 was not sustainable.”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The right to freedom of expression of the press in the present case must give way to the right to privacy of the plaintiff, especially when he has been exonerated of all the allegations leading to his honourable acquittal.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Section 34, quite apart from its classically limited scope, is certainly not intended to be used as a tool for a litigant to desist from participating in the arbitral proceedings, despite being fully aware thereof, and, thereafter, seek a second bite at the arbitral cherry.”

Chef Kunal Kapur
Hot Off The PressNews

Supreme Court has referred the case to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre to explore the possibility of any out-of-court settlement.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The very branding and labelling of the said Tablet as Coronil appear to suggest that the drug nullifies the coronavirus, it cures the disease, which may even amount to mis-labelling and/or mis-branding of the drug, which is impermissible under the provisions of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court refrained from commenting on the merits of the contentions of either party, as trial was pending in the matter.

High Court weekly Round Up
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner sought two additional legal meetings with his Lawyers in a week through video conferencing on the ground that he is embroiled in more than 30 cases in various States of India and even though he has been granted interim bail in a case, but his relief has not become infructuous as he still continues to be in custody in other matters.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is a series which appears to be more in the genre of comedy, and merely describes the main character as a topper in Chartered Accountancy Examination. It is neither intended nor can be perceived to be derogatory to the profession of Chartered Accountancy.”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It was said that when a mark as distinctive and well-known as “Adidas” is copied, it can dilute the mark’s distinctiveness and harm the brand’s reputation, irrespective of the differences in the product categories.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The leitmotif that “justice should not only be done but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done”, must not be limited only to court proceedings, but must also apply proprio-vigore to investigation of crime. Investigation must also be seen to be fair and just.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The formation of opinion under Section 20(2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 is in the exercise of supervisory powers of Central Information Commission and not in the exercise of the adjudicatory powers.

Stay of bail order
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“An order granting a stay to the operation of the order granting bail during the pendency of the application for cancellation of bail should be passed in very rare cases”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A forensic audit was conducted by Grant Thornton LLP at the request of the respondent-bank. The audit led to the withdrawal of the ‘red flagging’ of the company’s account.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It is the bounden duty of the employer to be sensitive and responsive to the physical difficulties that a working lady would face in performing her duties at the workplace while carrying a baby or bringing up the child post birth.