Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The claims made by the Manoj Manchu not only have the effect of tarnishing the credibility of Vinay Maheshwari as a respectable member of society but may further encourage the other individuals and media platforms to spread the defamatory content further. It may lead to widespread public dissemination and lasting damage to his image.”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“While the petition specifically pertains to female washrooms, the directions shall apply equally to male, female, and handicapped washrooms in District Courts to ensure a uniform standard of hygiene and functionality.”

High Court weekly Round Up
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The plaintiff Rahul Mishra is a leading Indian Fashion designer based out of Delhi and is engaged in creating exquisitely and luxuriously designed and handcrafted fashion clothes/ apparels under his own fashion label ‘RAHUL MISHRA’.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court restrained all premises of Being FS Pacific Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. including ‘Birch by Romeo Lane’ from playing or using the sound recordings of Novex Communications Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘Not providing required medical treatment to victim/survivor of sexual offence is a criminal offence.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Wipro Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. had registered its well-known trade mark “WIPRO” and its formative trade marks in various classes under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The continuous acts of infringement by Movie World Visual Media Private Limited are resulting in serious reputational loss and undermining the economic interest of Saregama India Limited vis-a-vis other licensees who have acquired proper license for valuable consideration of Saregama’s copyrighted works.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The comparison of images of both names makes it abundantly clear that defendant 1 has copied the most distinctive part of the plaintiff’s mark, which is ‘Evergreen’. In the case of the defendant 1, the word ‘Evergreen’ has the prefix “JV” and the suffix “Sweets and Treats”, whereas in the plaintiff’s case, the word ‘Evergreen’ is followed by the word “Sweet House”.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allegedly, the entire premise of the advertisement campaign by Alpino Health Foods was to denigrate oats as a category of food, including Marico’s ‘Saffola Oats’.

Puja Khedkar anticipatory bail
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Puja Khedkar was alleged to have misrepresented information in her application for the UPSC Exam, 2022.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It was said that if no ex-parte ad-interim injunction is granted, Mankind Pharma would suffer an irreparable loss.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The accused was directed to be released on suspension of sentence after considering that the sentence awarded was for 3 years and he had already served 2/3rd of the same.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Plaintiffs submitted that being the ex-franchisee, Defendant 1 was clearly aware of the ownership and notoriety of the ‘MOTI MAHAL’, ‘MOTI MAHAL DELUX TANDOORI TRAIL’, ‘TANDOORI TRAIL’ and their formative marks as well as the goodwill and reputation enjoyed by the plaintiffs related to the said trade marks.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court expected the State to ensure adequate protection of the fundamental rights of Amandeep Singh Batra, including his right to life and liberty.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court directed for the CRPF personnel to be considered as having proceeded on voluntary retirement w.e.f. 30-06-2021.

Motor Vehicle Accident
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court noted that the appellant will remain dependent on another person for the rest of her life. Even though the physical age will increase, her mental age will be that of a child studying in the 2nd Standard. Effectively, while her body grows, she will remain a small baby.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘Being careful while giving reasons to candidates for which they have not been appointed would help in avoiding such litigation which entails cost for candidates who may not be able to afford it.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Petitioner has established that that it was the prior registered proprietor and prior user of the mark ‘GANESH’ and its other formative marks since 1936. The adoption and use of the mark ‘GANESH HARA MATAR’ by Respondent 1, is likely to create confusion in the market.”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Personal jewellery which is not found to have been acquired on an overseas trip and was always a used personal effect of the passenger would not be subject to the monetary prescriptions incorporated in Rules 3 and 4 of Baggage Rules, 2016.