Anti-Arbitral Injunctions: Defeating Party Autonomy or Preventing Abuse of Arbitral Process?
by Vasanth Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada**
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 83
BCCI
Delhi High Court grants injunction to Viacom18 for exclusively streaming/transmitting events conducted by BCCI
“It may be useful for the Legislature to formulate a policy by which disputes related to rogue websites can be avoided, which are taking up time of the courts.”
Madras High Court restrains internet providers from broadcasting IPL auctions and events; Grants interim relief to Viacom 18
Madras High Court granted interim relief to Viacom 18, as it has made out a prima facie case on merits and the balance of convenience was also in its favour.
Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction in favour of Dream 11 in a trade mark infringement suit
Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction in favour of Dream 11 against the person who was operating under the domain name ‘www.dream11.bet’ and held that the domain name adopted by the defendant was deceptively similar to that of the plaintiffs and was clearly intended to ride on the goodwill and reputation of the plaintiff’s marks.
Bombay High Court| Nature of activities conducted by BCCI are commercial in nature, liable to pay employees contribution under ESI Act, 1948
Bombay High Court: Bharati Dangre, J. dismissed an appeal which was filed by Board of Control for Cricket of India (‘BCCI’), being
‘Power’ of conducting IPL is vitally distinct from ‘Object’ of BCCI: ITAT explains substantive law, allows BCCI to continue registration under S. 12-A of Income Tax Act to avail tax exemption benefits
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai: A two-Member Bench of Pramod Kumar (Vice President) and Ravish Sood (Judicial Member) allowed the Board
Conditional Exemption | Permission granted to BCCI to use drones
Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA) and Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) have granted a conditional exemption to the Board of Control
IPL spot-fixing: SC sets aside life ban imposed on Sreesanth by BCCI
Supreme Court: In a huge relief to cricketer S. Sreesanth, the bench of Ashok Bhushan and KM Joseph, JJ has set aside
SC appoints PS Narsimha as mediator for resolving disputes relating to BCCI
Supreme Court: The bench of SA Bobde and Abhay Manohar Sapre has appointed Senior Advocate PS Narsimha as a mediator in all
CIC directs BCCI to explain the grounds for not declaring it a ‘Public Authority’
Central Information Commission (CIC): The Commission recently dealt with an appeal seeking information on the provisions/guidelines under which BCCI represents INDIA also
Law Commission’s 275th report on Legal Framework: BCCI vis-à-vis Right to Information Act, 2005
The Law Commission of India’s (hereinafter ‘Commission’) 275th report, titled ‘Legal Framework: BCCI vis-à-vis Right to Information Act, 2005’, was recently submitted
SC to BCCI Office Bearers: Give suggestions on draft Constitution or face serious consequences
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, CJ and AM Khanwilkar and Dr DY Chandrachud, JJ directed the BCCI office bearers,
Cable operators cannot live telecast the cricket matches from the feed received by Prasar Bharati from Star Sports & ESPN
Supreme Court: In the matter relating rights of the cable operators and Direct-to-Home (DTH) operators to live telecast of cricket matches, the
BCCI Matter: Anurag Thakur’s apology accepted; Notice issued to N. Srinivasan and Niranjan Shah
Supreme Court: Accepting the fresh unconditional apology tendered on 13.07.2017, the Court dropped the contempt charges against the former BCCI President Anurag
BCCI matter: Anurag Thakur tenders fresh unconditional apology before Supreme Court
On 13.07.2017, the former BCCI President Anurag Thakur tendered a fresh unconditional apology before the Supreme Court after the Court rejected his
Former BCCI President Anurag Thakur asked to tender fresh unconditional apology
Supreme Court: Refusing to consider the earlier affidavit of apology filed by the former BCCI President Anurag Thakur, the 3-judge bench of
Amitabh Chaudhary and Rahul Johri to represent BCCI in the ICC Meeting on 24.04.2017
Supreme Court: The bench of Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. DY Chandrachud, JJ directed Amitabh Chaudhary, who is presently the acting
BCCI bound to honour the contracts with State Associations to avoid impediment to holding of matches
Supreme Court: Considering the fact that there is a test match which is going to be played between India and Australia tomorrow
BCCI Matter: Former CAG Vinod Rai to head the Committee of Administrators
Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench of Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ nominated the former Comptroller and Auditor General
BCCI Matter: Central Government permitted to suggest names for the Committee of Administrators
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ also accepted the submission of Mukul Rohatgi,