Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Once the objections raised by the petitioner is taken into consideration by Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services), Jind and an equitable jurisdiction is exercised, such view cannot outrightly be said to be perverse, improper or based on misappropriation of law and facts.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A sensitive approach is required to be acquired by the Courts while dealing with the offences constituting bribery allegations against a public officer as the same minimizes the trust of the public in public servants who are duty bound to protect them.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Since no protest was made by the petitioner’s former wife regarding petitioner’s second marriage, therefore, the same might have been a mitigating circumstance for the respondent to favourably exercise the empowerment vested in it regarding granting of ex-post sanction.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The question here is not about past wrongs, it is about the present failure to comply with a legally binding order. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is explicit on this point, that those in charge of a company during non-compliance are accountable. By holding a directorial position during this period, the petitioner is naturally included in this responsibility.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Had it been a case that there was any law provision applicable to students for scaling down or reducing of the marks, then it would have been a different situation. However, in the absence of any authority of law, the exercise was conducted by the clerical staff on their own without any guidelines or any rules and regulations.

Continue reading
Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Even if the ticket was not recovered from his person while preparing the inquest report of the deceased, mere filing of the affidavit on behalf of the appellant was sufficient to raise the presumption that the deceased was bona fide passenger.

Continue reading
Chhattisgarh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Considering the Rule 4(1)(d)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Ayush Graduate Course Admission Rules, 2023 is ultra vires, the Court directed the State Government to issue necessary instructions with respect to admission in Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery course in unaided minority institution.

Continue reading
Chhattisgarh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Section 482 of Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’) deleted the guiding factors which the Courts hearing anticipatory bail applications might have taken into account, such as nature and gravity of accusation, criminal antecedents, and the possibility of the accused to flee from justice.

Continue reading
Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The prosecution case has crumbled like a house of cards. Neither the circumstances have been proved which can lead to a conclusion that the accused was complicit in offence, nor any consistent prosecution version has come which can be relied upon.

Continue reading
Chhattisgarh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The news report alleged that at present, oxygen supply is being made from the oxygen cylinders which are brought from outside. Despite various authorities inspecting the Hospital, no heed is being paid for restarting the closed Oxygen plants.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

No sufficient reason was mentioned by the petitioner for the delay in filing the written statement and apparently blunt excuse was provided that the representative of the petitioner fell ill and no instructions could be issued to the Advocate.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

No plausible explanation was provided by the defendants as to why the trade mark ‘AMUL’ was adopted. No written statement was filed on behalf of the defendants. The conduct of the defendants highlighted their mala fide and dishonesty in adopting the same mark, as that of the plaintiffs’.

Continue reading
CESTAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

‘Namkeen’ has not been defined either contextually in the notification or as a separate nomenclature in the tariff under Schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Therefore, the Tribunal opined that the adjudicating authority had erred in concluding that the impugned goods were not ‘namkeen’.

Continue reading
CESTAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

All the activities rendered by the appellant are undertaken during hosting the cricket matches alone and if there were no cricket matches played, then all these services become irrelevant.

Continue reading