jammu encroachment removal
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Court, while ordering the removal of encroachments, directed that the officials concerned should use minimal force so that no unnecessary harassment was caused to anyone.”

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In Mumbai, open spaces are not available and is a major constraint, so, parking/dumping of seized vehicles cannot be resorted causing serious inconvenience to the public at large.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma CJ. and Sachin Shankar Magadum J. allowed the petition and quashed the

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Vinit Kumar Mathur and Sangeet Lodha, JJ., disposed of the petition and issued directions to

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: A Division bench comprising of Dinesh Maheswari and S.G. Pandit, JJ. while hearing a civil writ petition declined to

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court: Deciding on the matter of whether construction of a religious structure (Temple) and attempting to encroach upon the public