Writ Court cannot resolve Private/Contractual Disputes or Questions of Ownership in Land Dispute Cases: Calcutta High Court
Calcutta High Court opined that such disputes should be resolved by the Civil Court.
Calcutta High Court opined that such disputes should be resolved by the Civil Court.
Calcutta High Court held that when a decision involves a commercial transaction, it is primarily governed by commercial considerations not any public interest.
Calcutta High Court observed that the Courts should refrain from interfering in the grant of contracts or licenses unless there is clear arbitrariness or malafide conduct.
The Calcutta High Court held that an Expression of Interest can be treated as an offer if it lacks consideration and obliges one party to accept it without the opportunity to make a counteroffer.
Calcutta High Court acknowledges the Central Government’s efforts to promote cleaner fuels but emphasizes the importance of ensuring that essential commodities like kerosene remain accessible to those who depend on them for their basic needs.
The Calcutta High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, finding that the respondents had not acquired the land in question and issued a writ of mandamus to restrain the encroachment.
Calcutta High Court observed that the petitioner admitted the mistake of changing the business structure without obtaining prior approval.
The Calcutta High Court held that since the acquired land had been used for public purposes, compensation under the Act, 2013 should be provided to the petitioners.