Decoding Section 7 of IB Code for admitting an application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
by Ankit Parhar† and Rashi Srivastava††
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 55
I&B Code
Approaching police without resorting to special procedure under IB Code to arm twist the Resolution Professional is inappropriate: Madras High Court
Madras High Court said that there is no reason why the complaint was not filed either before IBBI or NCLT for the alleged fraud.
Thanos’ Infinite Gauntlet Given an Endgame Treatment – Jurisdiction of the NCLT under Section 60(5) as interpreted by the Apex Court
by Akaant Kumar Mittal†
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 23
Limitation in Filing Appeal before the NCLAT — Interesting Development
by Akaant Kumar Mittal†
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 8
‘Whether Enforcement directorate can attach properties of corporate debtor once moratorium is in force; Supreme Court issues notice in a SLP
Supreme Court: In a special leave petition (‘SLP’) having question of law, whether Enforcement directorate (‘ED’) can attach properties of corporate debtor
Differentiating Between Statutory vis-à-vis Contractual Charge Holders – Relevance During Liquidation – Analysis
by Akaant Kumar Mittal†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 81
Differentiating between Statutory vis-à-vis Contractual Charge Holders — Relevance During Liquidation — Initial Discussion
by Akaant Kumar Mittal†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 78
Insolvency for Individuals & Partnership Firms | Is it proper for NCLT to record finding regarding default when RP is yet to consider it and submit report? NCLAT discusses Ss. 95, 97, 99 IBC
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLAT): Coram of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Justice Jarat Kumar Jain, Judicial Member and
Hunch to Preserve the Telecom Sector Becomes a Window to Sabotage Concluded Resolution Processes
by Anurag Tripathi* and Naman Singh Bagga**
Avoidable transaction and the offenders window of escape: A perspective
by Naman Singh Bagga†, Maneesh Subramaniam†† and Anurag Tripathi†††
Whether an ex-employee of a financial creditor is eligible to be appointed as Resolution Professional? Read what SC says
Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench of Arun Mishra, B.R. Gavai and Krishna Murari, JJ., set aside the NCLAT’s Order with regard to
NCLAT | “I&B Code provides specific time frame to complete the process and NCLT should take it seriously”
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Bench of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) directed the National
Provisions of I&B Code must prevail over Section 434 of Companies Act if there is any inconsistency: SC
Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of R.F. Nariman and M.R. Shah, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the order of Rajasthan High
Application under Sections 7, 9 or 10 I&B Code not adversarial litigation; NCLT not required to record detailed decision thereunder: NCLAT
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial)
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under I&B Code is barred if winding up of the corporate debtor already ordered
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal: A two-member bench comprising of S.J. Mukhopadhaya and Bansi Lal Bhat, J., dismissed a company appeal filed
Application under Section 7 of I&B Code is to be rejected only after giving opportunity to rectify defect
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal: Order of the Adjudicating Authority rejecting the application filed by the petitioners under Section 7 of the