IBBI CIRP Fourth Amendment 2026: Key Changes to CoC Assistance, Cost Approval & Resolution Plan Rules
The amendment introduces key changes to enhance transparency and decision-making in insolvency proceedings.
The amendment introduces key changes to enhance transparency and decision-making in insolvency proceedings.
This amendment introduces key changes to Regulation 27 on the appointment of professionals under the CIRP framework with an exception for MSMEs.
Invocation of insolvency proceedings or the moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 cannot become a legal device to indefinitely stall redevelopment. The IBC was never intended to be used as a shield for non-performance at the cost of human rehabilitation.
Explore the latest cases reported in SCC’s Company Cases (Comp Cas) Volume on Banking business, Wilful Default, Resolution plan, Winding up and Liquidation, Corporate Insolvency, Recovery of debts and much more.
Explore the latest cases reported in SCC’s Company Cases (Comp Cas) Volume on Corporate Insolvency, Banking business, Dishonour of cheque, Securities Market Transactions, Resolution plan, Moratorium, Winding up and Liquidation and much more.
Recalling the previous judgment dated 2-5-2025, the Court found that this was a fit case warranting exercise of review jurisdiction vested in the Supreme Court.
The book release of “Corporate Insolvency: The Road to Viksit Bharat — Law, Policy and Practice”, authored by leading insolvency lawyer and author Sumant Batra and published by EBC (Eastern Book Company) took place recently in the second week of July in New Delhi.
The present appeal raises substantial questions about the legal framework governing the withdrawal of a CIRP; the settlement of claims after the admission of an application instituted by a debtor; and the scope of the inherent powers vested in the NCLAT under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules.
The applicant must have spent considerable resources fighting the suit for the last 20 years and therefore, it would not be appropriate to deprive him of the opportunity to execute the decree obtained in his favour.
by Ankit Parhar† and Rashi Srivastava††
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 55
The NCLAT held that there is no law which allows a third party or shareholders to settle the claims of Financial Creditor on behalf of the Corporate Debtor, M/s McDowell Holdings Limited.
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | Dismissing the appeals, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. and Kanthi Narahari
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Delhi: The Bench of Anant Bijay Singh, J., Judicial Member, and Shreesha Merla, Technical Member,
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) notified the following Amendment Regulations, 2020: (a) the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India