Justice Bela M. Trivedi retirement
Know thy Judge

Justice Bela M. Trivedi, who was appointed as a Supreme Court Judge in 2021, became the first woman Judge from Gujarat High Court to be elevated to the Supreme Court and is a Limca Book of Records holder.

Execution Appeals
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Namrata Chandorkar*

Delhi High Court service charge ban
Experts CornerNumen Law Offices

by Arush Khanna* and Vaibhav Mehra**

Students as Consumers
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Anchal Kanthed*

Legal Challenges
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Ashish Deep Verma*

National Technolawgy Battle
Law School NewsOthers

The Technolawgy Club, School of Law, UPES is pleased to invite participation for the “National Technolawgy Battle: Law Student vs. AI” an analytical quiz competition being organized by the Technolawgy Club, School of Law, UPES in collaboration with Dua Associates, as a part of VidhiUtsav 2025 law fest.

Agreements Must Be Reasonable
Cyril Amarchand MangaldasExperts Corner

by Saloni Kapadia* and Karan Gandhi**

Dark Patterns Outlawed
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Neha*

DSK LegalExperts Corner

by Mahip Singh*, Samir Malik** and Maitri Singh***

2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 3
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

Conversion rate of foreign currency for computation of awarded amount must be considered

Road Less Travelled
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Urvashi Misra* and Anant Narayan Misra**

Consumer Protection Act
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Baglekar Akash Kumar*

Onus to prove service for commercial purpose on service provider
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“If and only if, the service provider discharges its onus of showing that the service was availed, in fact for a commercial purpose, does the onus shift back to the complainant to show that the service was obtained exclusively for the purpose of earning its livelihood by means of self-employment.”

Britannia
Case BriefsDistrict Court

“Such a deceptive act from the part of an erring manufacturer or trader is tantamount to jeopardizing the very dignity of the consumer and his right to live a life free from exploitation or deception or any kind of unfair trade practice.”

Consumer protection Act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Any interpretation of the Preamble or the scheme of the Act for construing ‘Profession’ as ‘Business’ or ‘Trade’; or ‘Professional’ as ‘service provider’ would be extending the scope of the Act which was not intended, rather would have a counter productive effect”

promotional trailer
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Promotional trailers are unilateral and are only meant to encourage a viewer to purchase the ticket to the movie, which is an independent transaction and contract from the promotional trailer. A promotional trailer by itself is not an offer and neither intends to nor can create a contractual relationship.”

consumer complaint by company under Consumer Protection Act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

In the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, a body corporate was brought within the definition of ‘person’, indicating that the legislature realized the incongruity in the unamended provision and rectified the anomaly by including the word ‘company’ in the definition of ‘person’.

2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 34: Objections to the award: Law summarised relating to Court’s power to review awards under

Central Consumer Protection Authority
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Ishita Singh

Supreme Court Expands
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Namrata Chandorkar†