Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The confessional statement was signed beyond the official hours in the office premises in the presence of only male witnesses.

Case BriefsSupreme Court

There was an apparent error of law in the order passed by the Gujarat High Court as the writ court is primarily concerned with examination of the decision-making process when a disciplinary action is challenged. Accordingly, the Supreme Court upheld the order of removal from service passed by the disciplinary authority.

Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court viewed that the tender authority, has been given a certain degree of leverage by the courts, being the best person to understand its requirements. Hence, a mere disagreement with the authority's decision-making process is not a reason for a constitutional court to interfere.

Maharashtra Assembly
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Vijay K. Tyagi†

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: On the issue of the scope of judicial review of action by the State in a matter arising from a

Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Allahabad High Court: In a public interest litigation petition instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the

Tripura High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Tripura High Court: In a batch of writ petitions filed for directing the State Government to provide similar Pension benefit as granted

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of NV Ramana, CJI and Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli, JJ has referred the question relating to

Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Madras High Court: S. M Subramaniam, J. upheld the government order that stated, the Degree of B.Sc (Biochemistry) awarded by

competitive exam
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. denied relief to Swastika Ghosh and Manush Shah (‘Petitioner(s)'), table tennis players who

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a big relief for A.G. Perarivalan, convicted for assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, the 3-judge bench of

Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Section 432 (2) of the CrPC would stand defeated if the opinion of the presiding judge becomes just another factor that may be taken into consideration by the government while deciding the application for remission.”

Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The purpose of a disciplinary proceeding by an employer is to enquire into an allegation of misconduct by an employee which results in a violation of the service rules governing the relationship of employment.”

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of D.N. Patel, CJ and Jyoti Singh, J., held that the Chairman of Central Administrative Tribunal

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a breather to the candidates challenging the RAS Pre-examination result, the bench of KM Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi CJ and Sudesh Bansal J. stayed the impugned judgment and left it open

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of D.N. Patel, CJ and Jyoti Singh, J., dismisses Dr Subramanian Swamy’s plea stating that any

Case BriefsSupreme Court (Constitution Benches)

Supreme Court: In spite of going through several rounds of litigation and long hours consideration, the Adhaar Controversy had once again popped

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Addressing a grievance with regard to the denial of inter-cadre transfer Division Bench of Rajiv Shakdher and Talwant Singh,

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Devanshu Sajlan*