Telangana High Court: Lalitha Kanneganti, J., disposed of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy.

The instant writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondent 2 in forcing the petitioner to compromise the case with the accused on the file of Women Police Station, DD, Hyderabad, not taking the statements of the witnesses and further delaying in conducting of investigation and filing charge sheet as arbitrary, unjust and violation of the Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

Counsel for the petitioner Ms Pratibha Bejjarram submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the police which was registered and instead of conducting investigation into the alleged crime, the police are forcing the petitioner to compromise the matter with the unofficial respondents and they are not conducting proper investigation and not filing the charge sheet, hence, she has come up before this Court.

Counsel for respondent Mr S. Rammohan Rao submitted that in the course of investigation, seven witnesses were examined and their detailed statements have been recorded. It was further stated the respondents are not pressurizing the petitioner to compromise the matter.

The Court observed that when a complaint is given and a cognizable offence is made out, police have to register a crime and conduct thorough investigation and file the charge sheet. However, any lapse on the part of the Investigating Officer cannot be a ground for the petitioner to approach this Court. The Court based on different documents produced before Court cannot decide the disputed questions of fact and it has no mechanism or the procedure to unravel the truth. The appropriate and efficacious remedy available to the petitioner, if she is aggrieved by the action / inaction of the Investigating Officer is to file a private complaint against the said officer before the competent Court. Day in and day out, several writ petitions are being filed stating that the police are not conducting proper investigation and not filing the charge sheet nor they are arresting the accused. By any stretch of imagination, those issues cannot be decided by this Court while exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The Court held “In the light of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy. There shall be no order as to costs.”

[K. Savya v. Station House Officer, Writ Petition No. 20097 of 2022, decided on 21-04-2022]

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.

Must Watch

maintenance to second wife

bail in false pretext of marriage

right to procreate of convict

Criminology, Penology and Victimology book release

Join the discussion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.