High Court of Kerala : Observing the allegations of offences punishable under Section 354-A of the  Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 7 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 against the petitioner, the Bench comprising of Sunil Thomas, J., quashing the criminal proceeding observed that since the dispute between the parties has been resolved and they have agreed to settle hence the allegation including sexual assault on a minor woman and under the provisions of POCSO Act, stands dismissed.

The respondent filed a complaint against the petitioner on ground that he had touched his 15-year-old minor daughter with a malafide intention and  thereby  outraged her modesty on the basis of which investigation was initiated and was progressing. However, the petitioner approached the Court stating that disputes between the parties have been resolved and parents of the victim have agreed to settle the disputes and have also submitted an affidavit for the same that discloses a fair and genuine intention of the parties.

The Court observed that continuance of the proceedings will not be in the interest of parties concerned and quashed the complaint against the petitioner/accused. Further, the Court stated that since the allegations against the petitioner accused involved sexual assault on a minor woman and some provisions of the POCSO Act hence, whether the incident happened accidentally or whether it was done intentionally is a highly disputed question of fact. [Sajith S. v. State of Kerala, Crl.MC.No. 7251 of 2016, decided on  7.11.2016]

Must Watch

maintenance to second wife

bail in false pretext of marriage

right to procreate of convict

Criminology, Penology and Victimology book release

One comment

  • section 7 and 8 of pocso read with 354 of
    IPC is misusing and the Hon’ble Court is not ready to understand that these section are using to hararrs the accused to settle down some disputes between parties which is dangerous for the society in future. these sections has been used by the advocates to settle down the property matters but hon’ble court are depend only on statement of 164 of cr.p.c. . Hon’ble Court do not appply its mind that a children can give statement on order of her parents like child artist play a role in TV serials which is dangerous for future society and innocent persons are being harrassed by law.

Join the discussion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.