Critical Analysis of Supreme Court Judgment in Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority v. Prabhjit Singh Soni
by Gaurav Mitra* and Lavanya Pathak**
NOIDA
Decoding Allahabad High Court verdict on applicability of doctrine of severability on arbitral awards
“Section 34 confers power on the court to set aside an award, the power could be exercised to set aside any or all such awards, whether composite, interim, final or additional”
Classification of ‘pushtaini’ and ‘gair-pushtaini’ landholders bad in law, creates dissonance between Land Acquisition Act’s object and effect: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court opined that even if such a classification had a rational nexus to the objective of the notification, the classification must also be legitimized by the parent statute.
Issue-wise analysis of why SC ordered demolition of illegal twin towers constructed by Supertech, prosecution of NOIDA and Supertech officials for collusion and possible statutory violations
‘The law must step in to protect legitimate concerns of residents whose quality of life is directly affected by the failure of
NCDRC | Whether NOIDA being a public authority could have adopted a different policy for extending construction period between same category of persons? Read on
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Coram of C. Viswanath (Presiding Member) and Justice Ram Surat Ram Maurya (Member) observed that, NOIDA
Supreme Court directs NOIDA to pay Rs 36 crore compensation in a land acquisition dispute for illegally taking over excess land
Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of Rohinton Fali Nariman and B.R. Gavai, JJ., settled a decade-old land-acquisition dispute by directing NOIDA
Supreme Court to decide whether NOIDA is a corporation established by the Uttar Pradesh Government
Supreme Court: The bench of R.K. Agrawal and A.M. Sapre, JJ agreed to examine a plea of the income tax department whether