Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
Orissa High Court: Savitri Ratho J. released the appellant on interim bail for a period of four months to the satisfaction of
“The ossification test can be said to be relevant for determining the approximate age of a person in conflict with law. However, when the person is around 40-55 years of age, the structure of bones cannot be helpful in determining the age.”
Supreme Court: In a bid to clear the air over the applicability of and the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children)
S.O. 1595(E)— In pursuance of Section 4 of the Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005 (4 of 2006), the Government
Supreme Court: Showing dismay over the “tardy implementation” of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 and the Juvenile
Supreme Court: In the case where the appellants were involved in at least 24 cases of various offences allegedly committed between 1988
Supreme Court: While dealing with the question of the sentencing of a juvenile in light of the enactment of the Juvenile Justice