mobile screen separate commodity size relevant Rule 6(1)(f)
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Ruling in Samsung’s favour, the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a phone’s screen cannot be treated as a separate commodity requiring its own size declaration under the Legal Metrology Rules.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘The Standing Order issued by the Director General, CRPF makes it evident that medical category SHAPE-I is an essential condition for promotion of all combatised personnel in all groups, ranks, and cadres in the Central Armed Police Forces.’

Orissa High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted that a review Departmental Proceedings Committee was held to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion and the decision was kept in sealed covers, pending disposal of Disciplinary Proceedings.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of B. Kemal Pasha, J. drew a nexus between the act and the discharge

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of Uday U. Lalit and Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment of the

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Hima Kohli and Rekha Palli, JJ., dismissed a writ petition filed seeking directions to