2024 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 34(3): Limitation period under S. 34(3) for filing petition challenging arbitral award is considered
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 34(3): Limitation period under S. 34(3) for filing petition challenging arbitral award is considered
The contention of appellants that they and their predecessor acquired the right of adverse possession over the suit land was not accepted by the Court in the absence of cogent evidence on record.
Consumer Protection — Consumer Forums — Jurisdiction and Powers of Consumer Forum — Relegation to civil suit/ADR/Arbitration: Consumer disputes are non-arbitrable, [M.
This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1952 on partition of Hadapsar lands under Hindu law.
“Law leans in favour of legitimacy and frowns upon the bastardy.”
Supreme Court: In a case where a portion of a joint Hindu Family was alienated ‘out of love and affection’ by way
Supreme Court: The bench of SA Nazeer and Krishna Murari*, JJ has held that if a female Hindu dies intestate without leaving
Supreme Court: In a suit where the Karta of a Joint Hindu Family, consisting of himself, his wife and his son, had