District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

VLCC failed to deliver on their promise by not conducting the courses as per the agreed terms. Furthermore, their suggestion to adjust the course fees against the enrolment of a relative was found to be unfair and contrary to consumer protection principles by DCDRC.

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The District Consumer Commission observed that issuance of poorly printed bills to consumers may constitute ‘deficiency of service’ and an ‘unfair trade practice’ as per directives issued by Kerala State Department of Consumer Affairs.

district consumer disputes redressal commission
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Commission stated that the Indigo’s deficiency in services caused the married couple irrevocable hardship and spoiled their holiday mood.

district consumer disputes redressal commission
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Amazon defended its case saying that it was merely an online platform and not the seller of such defective telescope, contending that there was no deficiency in service.