Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
Transparency forms the core of good governance, and promotes efficiency and effectiveness in the functioning of the government
With 1263 judgments delivered; three Chief Justices of India taking turns to lead the judiciary; a number of judges retiring and a
Supreme Court: On the issue of the scope of judicial review of action by the State in a matter arising from a
The High Court of Justice (Technology and Construction Court): While deciding the instant matter revolving around the Dispute Resolution Procedure
Delhi High Court: Vibhu Bakhru, J. while hearing an application against award of an arbitral tribunal has held that it would not
by Khushi Sharma* and Kashish Lalwani**
Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Dinesh Maheshwari and Vikram Nath, JJ., while addressing a matter with regard to the tender document,
“Equity demands that when the State failed to produce an iota of evidence of either financial loss or any other public interest that has been affected, it should be compelled to fulfill its promises.”
Supreme Court: On the question as to ‘whether time is of the essence in a contract’, the bench of NV Ramana, CJ*
Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma CJ and Sachin Shankar Magadum J allowed the petition, quashed the initial
United States District Court, North District of California: While issuing a permanent injunction, stating Apple could no longer prohibit developers linking to
Delhi High Court: Vibhu Bakhru, J., held that the scope of interference with an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration
Supreme Court: The bench of L. Nageswara Rao* and Vineet Saran, JJ has shed light on how Courts should proceed while interpreting
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: While deliberating upon the question that whether no-hire, or “no poach,” provisions that are ancillary to a services
by Apurv Parashari*
by Karl Shroff*