mobile tower health hazard
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court further noted that the new statutory framework under Telecommunications Act, 2023 and Telecommunications (Right of Way) Rules, 2024, now governs the installation, operation and maintenance of telecommunication towers.

treating income from same source differently
Case BriefsHigh Courts

For the purposes of Income Tax Act, 1961, the business which is involved in letting out premises on hire, would be said to have commenced right from the stage of repairing and furnishing of property for being rented out and cannot be treated as commenced only when the premises are actually let out to tenants.

PIL on MIDC land allotment
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“In the present case, there is no challenge to Land Disposal Regulations, which empower Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) to make allotments by entertaining private applications.”

MADC to refund 10.29 crores to Wipro
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Maharashtra Airport Development Company Limited (‘MADC’) is an instrumentality of State and is expected to act fairly. If MADC is permitted to retain the advance amount, the same would amount to unjust enrichment, as it has already allotted 33 acres of land to other entities at much higher rate.

vintage car sale taxable
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Capability of a car for personal use would not ipso facto lead to automatic presumption that every car would be personal effects for being excluded from capital assets of the Assessee.”

loan for non-business purpose deemed dividend
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Mere maintenance of running account by the appellant with GPIL, having continuous business transactions with them or mere repayment of advance within same financial year cannot be the reasons to admit that the amount of advance is actually utilized for execution of business transaction.

Kolhapuri Chappal GI violation case against PRADA
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Both the registered proprietors are well equipped to protect their rights flowing from registered GI in Kolhapuri Chappals by bringing action against PRADA, if they believe that PRADA is unauthorisedly using the registered GI.”

Advocates not covered under POSH Act
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is evident that the provisions of the POSH Act apply where the relationship of employer and employee exists, thus, neither Bar Council of India nor Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa can be said to be employer of advocates.”

Road line sanction quashed
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The impugned road line had affected petitioner’s civil rights and therefore opportunity of hearing was necessary, though not specifically provided in Section 291 of the MMC Act and subsequently the Slum Rehabilitation Authority needs to properly apply its mind to all the relevant factors after granting opportunity of hearing to all parties concerned.”

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A PIL was filed by a social worker-petitioner in 2014 in relation to New Year eve liquor party, but no action was taken, hence, petitioner sought re-enquiry.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The State Government is presently considering the financial impact and will take an appropriate decision regarding the creation of additional posts for the State Information Commissioners if the occasion arises.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The State Government is directed to take a policy decision regarding immersion of idols made of PoP in the light of the recommendations dated 21-5-2025 issued by the Expert Committee of Central Pollution Control Board.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The name “Karan Johar” is solely associated with Respondent 1, Karan Johar and forms a germane part of his personality and brand name and thus, has the economic right to commercially exploit the same as per his discretion.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The officials of the applicant, i.e., the Airport Authority of India, may have been over cautious in protecting its interest and hence impleaded Respondent 1 which is the owner of the aircrafts”.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted that the expression “not suitable” was not defined under the Act. Therefore, it was necessary to lay down the guidelines in this regard, which would be done by an expert committee.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Under Section 66 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, the State Advisory Board on Disability for differently abled persons has been constituted.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The State Government is required to follow the guidelines laid down by National Health Mission Conditionalities Framework 2022-2024 and increase the number of ambulances as per the population norms.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“If BCI’s rule making power under Section 49(d) of Advocates Act, 1961 is given a restrictive meaning, the same will be contrary to object and purpose of Section 7(1)(h),(i),(l), and (m), which is enacted with the objective to empower BCI to promote legal education and to lay down standards of education.”

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

To incentivize adoption of FASTag from user fee payment, Respondent 1 provided cashback ranging from 10% to 2.5% on toll transactions via FASTag from 2016 till March 2020 i.e., for five years.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Ensure that any activity though aimed at as a commercial activity, does not deplete the available natural resources and even if it does so, in any minimized way, its loss shall be compensated.