delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Whilst the court is not unduly bound by the texts or Order XXXVIII Rule 1 and 2 or Order XXXVIII Rule (5) or any other provisions of CPC, the substantial principles for grant of such interim measures cannot be disregarded.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court held that even if the Contract clearly stated that before resorting to arbitration, the parties agreed to explore Conciliation by the Committee, the same cannot be held to be mandatory in nature. Further, the Court held that in case of urgency, arbitral proceedings can be initiated even when conciliation proceedings were pending.

Himachal Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Himachal Pradesh High Court: In the case where it was argued before the Court that the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Uttaranchal High Court: Emphasizing on the purpose and object of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Division bench of

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Ramkishore Karanam*and Mahasweta M.**

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Hiroo Advani†, Sheikh Yusuf Ali †† and Manav Nagpal†††
Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 30

Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The exercise of inherent power of the High Court is an extraordinary power which has to be exercised with great care and circumspection before embarking to scrutinise the complaint/FIR/charge-sheet in deciding whether the case is the rarest of rare case, to scuttle the prosecution at its inception.”

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: C. Hari Shankar, J., addressed three different petitions between the same parties arising out of the award passed by

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Alabh Anant Lal* & Soham Banerjee**