BCCI — The Question of State, and the Broadcasting Rights
by Rani Vaishnavi and Shobhit Arora*
abuse of dominant position
2026 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3: Key Supreme Court Cases on Criminal Law, Constitution, Competition Act, & NDPS
Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases in 2026 SCC Vol. 2 Part 3 on vesting of private forests, road safety, professional communication, and Aravalli Hills & Ranges.
CCI imposes Rs 27 Crores penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors
CCI noted that warranty is an important factor when buying a boxed microprocessor, as it protects against defects and gives consumers confidence. Intel’s data from 2016—2021 shows failures do occur, so denying warranty in India for products bought abroad harms consumers and creates adverse effects on competition.
‘CCI has power to address menace of anti-competitive practices’; Kerala HC dismisses JioStar’s appeal against CCI probe
CCI has jurisdiction to investigate allegations of abuse of dominant position in the broadcasting market, irrespective of TRAI’s regulatory framework.
READ WHY CCI imposed Rs. 6 lakhs penalty on the Federation of Publishers’ and Booksellers’ Associations in India
The CCI further held the former and present Presidents of FPBAI and Chairman of GOC, and Secretary of FPBAI, liable under Section 48 of the Competition Act, 2002.
Read why CCI dismissed claim against Hindalco and Vedanta alleging duopoly & abuse of dominant position vis-a-vis copper supply
“The condition for de-pricing and recovery of loss for the booked copper is applicable only in case the terms of the contract are not fulfilled by the purchaser resulting in loss to the seller. Such condition in the commodity market which is prone to price risks cannot be considered to be unfair.”
CCI approves Google’s ₹20.24 crore settlement in Android TV anti-competitive practices case
The CCI directed Google to submit annual compliance reports for five years and implement the Settlement Proposal per its submitted timeline.
‘Findings not contrary to the weight of record’; Supreme Court affirms NCLAT’s order refusing to stay CCI’s Rs 1,338 crore penalty on Google LLC for anti-competitive practices
The Supreme Court had reservation to express its opinion on the merits of the case which would otherwise affect the proceedings pending before NCLAT and stated that the findings of the CCI at the interlocutory stage was neither without jurisdiction nor suffered from any error which would necessitate interference in the appeal.
DLF is a dominant enterprise in developing commercial space in Kolkata? CCI analyses
Competition Commission of India (CCI): On finding that DLF being a new entrant in developing commercial space in Kolkata and having only
Star India providing bouquet of channels at lesser prices resulting significant loss in consumer base of Asianet Digital Network: Star India abusing dominance of its position? CCI answers
Competition Commission of India (CCI): The Coram of Ashok Kumar Gupta (Chairperson) and Sangeeta Verma and Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi (Members), noted allegations
CCI | Does integration of Google Meet with Gmail amount to abuse of dominant position by Google under Competition Act? Commission answers
Competition Commission of India (CCI): The Coram of Ashok Kumar Gupta (Chairperson) and Sangeeta Verma and Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi (Members) dismissed the
CCI | “Treebo” alleges “MakeMy Trip” & “OYO” for abuse of dominant position & entering into a vertical agreement – DG directed for investigation
Competition Commission of India (CCI): The Coram comprising of Ashok Kumar Gupta (Chairperson) and Sangeeta Verma and Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi, Members, while
CCI | No abuse of dominant position contemplated under S. 4 of Competition Act found against Gujarat SBST
Competition Commission of India (CCI), New Delhi: Coram comprising of Ashok Kumar Gupta (Chairman) and U.C. Nahta and Sangeeta Verma (Members), dismissed
CCI finds conduct and practice of Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. to be in contravention of Competition Law
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has found Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) to be in contravention of the provisions of Section 4