Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that mere fact that at present hospitalisation was not required and the applicant can be treated on outpatient basis did not disentitle the applicant from grant of medical bail.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘Although Genpact had alluded to the amended statutory regime that had come into existence and had informed the AO of the obligation to follow the procedure under Section 148A, no legal challenge was instituted to impugn the action commenced by notice dated 30-06-2021.’

shashi tharoor 2018 defamatory statements against PM Modi
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Shashi Tharoor while addressing the audience at the Bangalore Literature Festival in 2018 had quoted lines from the article published by the Caravan magazine and which said that “Mr. Modi is like a scorpion sitting on a Shivling; you cannot remove him with your hand, and you cannot hit it with a chappal either.”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“An average consumer with an imperfect recollection is likely to be deceived into thinking that the plaintiff has opened a new ‘SOCIAL’ outlet in Vadodara, Gujarat where the defendant is operating its outlet.”

Delhi High Court
Hot Off The PressNews

The tweet stemmed from an interview of Manu Bhaker conducted by Rohan Dua after she won two bronze medals at the Paris Olympics.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘If the State fails to adhere to the practical necessity of preserving human life, it leads to a tragic loss of human dignity.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner is seeking right of physical interview in terms of Delhi Prison Rules and must therefore, exercise it in accordance thereof. He cannot, on one hand, seek right to physical interview according to Rule 589 DPR and on the other hand, not abide by the conditions contained therein.

HIGH COURTS SEPTEMBER 2024 WEEKLY ROUNDUP
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

Take a quick glance at what the High Courts were discussing in this late Monsoon season.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 does not envisage the CCPD as an adjudicatory body capable of deciding service-related disputes or issuing enforceable orders.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act aims and visualizes a situation where there may not be an institution of any fresh case, once the matter is settled through pre-institution mediation.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘Such a legal vacuum disabling the villagers from managing their immovable properties prima facie violates their fundamental right under Article 21 and constitutional rights under Article 300A of the Constitution.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A person castigating their employer through a constant tirade of false and scandalous allegations does not deserve to continue in the employment of the said employer.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘The dual-language approach will help in preventing future instances of non-compliance due to language barriers and ensure that the rights and opportunities are accessible to all citizens, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The term “Aashiqui” does not describe the general category of goods or services (films) but instead functions as a distinctive brand identifier for the Aashiqui Franchise.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

As per Clause 26.2 of the Agreement, the Chairman/Managing Director of the Board of Directors of Contractors was supposed to do the conciliation and not the committee constituted by NHIDCL.

Criminal Law Monthly Roundup August 2024
Legal RoundUpTopic-wise Roundup

Criminal law discussions that unfolded at the Supreme Court and various High Courts in the month of August

Intellectual Property Rights Roundup
Legal RoundUpTopic-wise Roundup

A quick recap of top Intellectual Property cases on sale of counterfeit copies of EBC’s books, Nizam’s trade mark, Mankind v. Mercykind, Adidas, L’Oréal, Electronica, and more.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The present dispute between Express Newspapers and the Government has spanned over five decades and has witnessed critical historical events such as the Emergency and its aftermath.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘The functions performed by the Election Commission of India under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 are essentially quasi-judicial in nature, and any order issued thereunder constitutes a quasi-judicial order.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Donations, gifts etc., which were being received by the appellant, and being vested in the committee, from various institutions will be endowments for public purpose.