paristone prestige pressure cookers
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“That defendants have chosen to imitate the manner in which plaintiff prints its logo is itself testimony to the goodwill and reputation of plaintiff, in the perception of defendant itself.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The defendant’s pressure cookers are imitative of the suit designs of the plaintiff and the case of piracy under Section 22(1) of the Designs Act, 2000 exists, but due to the expiry, the suit design is now in the public domain and there can be no judgment or decree restraining use of the suit design by anyone.”