Authority for Advance Ruling (Karnataka)
Advance RulingsCase Briefs

KAAR ruled that as the applicant is providing maintenance and repair services of test bench equipment used for testing air worthiness of an aircraft that does not qualify to be an aircraft or an aircraft engine. Further, to be termed as other aircraft components it should form a component of aircraft and, hence, not taxable at the rate of 5 percent GST.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section

Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Anil Choudhary (Judicial Member) allowed the appeals which were filed against the common Order-in-Appeal