Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
Third IBA India Litigation and ADR Symposium 2024: From fringe to focal: India at the centre of international dispute resolution- a symposium presented by the IBA India Working Group of the IBA Asia Pacific Regional Forum and supported by the IBA Arbitration Committee
The Increasing Diversity by Increasing Access to Legal Education (IDIA) Madhya Pradesh Chapter
by Vasanth Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada**
The High Court strictly noted that such a conduct is unbecoming for a person belonging to legal profession and also reprimanded the Tribunal for withholding the compensation from the petitioner due to a fee dispute between a layer and their client.
Delhi High Court observed that it seems that the petitioner, who is an Advocate, filed the present petition after being a beneficiary of the very same process only because he has been denied extension or reappointment.
Karnataka High Court: While deciding the instant appeal for restoration assailing the order passed by the Trial Court wherein the
Karnataka High Court: While deciding the instant petition seeking quashment of complaint against a Senior Advocate, wherein it was alleged that he
Interviewed by Vranda Agarwal
The Internship & Placement Cell of the University School of Law and Legal Studies, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi is organizing
Madras High Court: Expressing that, Power of discretion is to be exercised to mitigate the injustice if any occurred to the litigants,
by Radhika Bishwajeet Dubey†
Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi, CJ and Rekha Borana, J. dismissed the petition and kept it open for
by Hiroo Advani†, Asif Lampwala††, Kenneth Martin††† and Srishti Ramchandani*
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 13
“When the undeniable facts, including the traffic blockage due to agitation, are taken into consideration, the State alone remains responsible for not providing smooth passage of traffic.”
Delhi High Court: While expressing its opinion on the position of an advocate in law, C. Hari Shankar, J., expressed that, There
Supreme Court: In a case where the party, in a subsequent petition seeking same relief, had not disclosed the filing of the
Rajasthan High Court: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J., allowed a petition which dealt with the issue as to whether the third child born