Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Respondent 1 was enrolled in Indian Army and was discharged from service on compassionate grounds. During his service, he incurred the disability of ‘Sensori Neural Hearing Loss B/L-H90′. Respondent 1’s disability element claim was rejected by the Competent Authority on the ground the disability is assessed as less than 20%.

Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Since no protest was made by the petitioner’s former wife regarding petitioner’s second marriage, therefore, the same might have been a mitigating circumstance for the respondent to favourably exercise the empowerment vested in it regarding granting of ex-post sanction.

Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Despite holding an indefeasible right to become the able recipient of disability pension, there was a financial detriment to the petitioner.

Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The power conferred in the High Court under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, is a residuary power and to be exercised only when no alternative remedy is available.

Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that if any of the partners in a live-in relationship has minor children, none of the partners is required to abandon his/her duty to provide optimum care and protection to the minor children.

Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the competitive examinations, the candidates work hard and make their best efforts to secure good marks. Therefore, only because of the date of issuance of degree/certificate, they should not be denied appointment as these were only procedural delays/lapses.

Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In consequence, the wanton disregard to the explicit directions as made by this Court, upon the trial Judge concerned, thus prima facie constitutes contempt of Court.