HP India GeM bid rigging CCI
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Commission held that an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), even though not itself participating as a bidder in public procurement, can incur liability under Section 3(3) read with Section 3(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 where it actively facilitates coordination amongst competing downstream resellers through exchange of commercially sensitive information, selective issuance of Manufacturer Authorisation Forms (MAFs), allocation of customers, coordination of bids and arrangement of cover bids. The Commission further held that the conduct of HP India and the resellers amounted to a contravention of the provisions relating to anti-competitive agreements and bid rigging under the Act.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court observed that when assessed, by the maxim generalia specialibus non derogant or by the maxim lex posterior derogat priori, the Patents Act must prevail over the Competition Act on the issue of exercise of rights by a patentee under the Patents Act.

competition (amendment) act 2023
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Aayushi Singh† and Pavitra Dubey††

NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

    National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: The Bench of Rakesh Kumar, J., Judicial Member, and Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra,

Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Competition Commission of India (CCI): The Bench of Ashok Kumar Gupta (Chairperson) and Sangeeta Verma and Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi, Members, while dealing