Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
Madras High Court said that natural justice clearly requires that the additional evidence placed on record by both parties should be considered by the Opposition Board.
The Supreme Court said that the power to take additional evidence in an appeal is to be exercised to prevent injustice and failure of justice, and thus, it must be exercised for good and valid reasons necessitating the acceptance of the prayer.
Himachal Pradesh High Court: Sandeep Sharma, J., allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order dated 17-07-2017. The facts of the case
Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J. allowed the application filed for challenging the order of the District Court
Supreme Court: In an appeal filed against the decision of the Allahabad High Court where it had rejected the application under Section
Orissa High Court: The Bench of A.K. Rath, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of District Court rejecting the application
Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed a criminal revision petition filed against the
Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., allowed a writ petition filed against the order of the Appellate