National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“There shall be liberty to the appellant to file a fresh Section 7 application for any default on the part of the corporate debtor subsequent to 10A period.”

National Company Law Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The NCLT acknowledged the impact of force majeure events, particularly the unprecedented rise in coal prices and operational disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic on Corporate Debtor.

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“Any dispute even pending in the arbitration does not in any manner prohibit the financial creditor to take remedy under Section 7 IBC.”

National Company Law Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The NCLT held that non-delivery of possession despite payments and continued acknowledgment of liability through emails and communications proved default under Section 7 IBC.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 states a financial creditor, either by itself or jointly, with other financial creditors, or any other person on behalf of the financial creditor, may file an application for initiating corporate insolvency resolution process against a corporate debtor before the Adjudicating Authority when a default has occurred.”

National Company Law Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The application is filed by Jammu and Kashmir Bank against the Himalayan Mineral Waters Private Limited for a total financial debt of Rs. 50,04,38,456/- for the credit facilities availed by Leel Electricals.

NCLAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Tribunal stated that if the withdrawal of the Section 9 Admission order was upheld and CIRP were to start afresh from the date of admission of the Section 7 Application, it would have resulted in an inadequate insolvency resolution of the corporate debtor.

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: A Division Bench of Indira Banerjee and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ. held that there is no bar in law to amendment

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench of Rohinton Fali Nariman, Navin Sinha and K.M. Joseph, JJ., in a 465-pages long judgment, upheld the

National Company Law Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai: The Bench of Bhaskara Pantula Mohan, Member (Judicial) and V. Nallasenapathy, Member (Technical) allowed a petition filed by

Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) disposed of an appeal by Asset Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd. with

Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Bench of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) allowed an