Judicial developments under MSMED Act
Experts CornerKhaitan & Co

by Milind Sharma*, Abhisaar Bairagi** and Ausaf Ayyub***

Real Estate Insolvency 2.0
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Isheeta Jain*

Union Budget 2025
Experts CornerLakshmikumaran & Sridharan

by Rachit Jain*, Shambhavi Mishra** and Ashwini Nag***

2024 SCC Vol. 10 Part 2
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 (60 of 1958) — Ss. 33, 34, 37, 4(2), 4(1) and Sch. I Art. 25 Expln. I — Stamp duty on agreement to sell — Liability to pay under the 1958 Act

Orissa High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the matter at hand, the appellant contended that the Council’s award ought to have been interfered with under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, as there was no conciliation in accordance with the procedure prescribed, a condition precedent for initiation of arbitration proceeding under Section 18 (3) of the MSMED Act.

Law of Limitation
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Aparna Ramesh Devkar

High Court weekly Roundup
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-maintainability as only non-appointees can assail the legality of the appointment or extension procedure.

bombay high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court held the instant applications under Section 11 of Arbitration Act as non-maintainable and dismissed the said applications.

jharkhand high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The MSMED Act, 2006 is a beneficial legislation with an object to promote and develop micro, small and/or medium enterprises, and the interpretation regarding a reference for the interest component alone would be in consonance with the object of the Act”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The MSMED Act, 2006 is a beneficial legislation for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises and ought to be construed in a manner that is beneficial to such enterprises.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court observed that the MSMED Act, 2006 has been enacted for the purpose of extending benefits to Suppliers, who are registered under the Act as Micro or Small Enterprises, it does not contemplate the reverse obligation i.e. claims relating to the amount recoverable from the Suppliers under the MSMED Act, 2006.

calcutta high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The MSMED Act of 2006 is a special statute as it was specifically enacted for facilitating the promotion and development of micro, small and medium Enterprises and enhancing their competitiveness.”

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT observed that allowing present appeal holding the Successful Resolution Applicant ineligible would automatically make the resolution plan redundant.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: In a petition filed by Gammon Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd. under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1996

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Swarnendu Chatterjee*and  G. Vidya Kamath**

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah* and AS Bopanna, JJ has held that in an appeal/application filed under Section 34 of

Legislation UpdatesStatutes/Bills/Ordinances

On August 12, 2021, the Central Government has notified the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Amendment Act, 2021 which has brought Pre-packaged Insolvency

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The bench of Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy*, JJ has held that the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of D.N. Patel, CJ and Prateek Jalan, J., held that as and when any advocate approaches the