Site icon SCC Times

Calcutta HC issues directions as ‘standard operating procedure’ for investigation and prosecution of crime

Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ravi Krishan Kapur and Joymalya Bagchi JJ., issued directions in a case involving commercial sexual exploitation of women and children that are to be followed as a standard operating procedure in the investigation and prosecution of such crimes.

The present case deals with the application for cancellation of bail for the offences under Sections 363/366/370/370 A/373/120 B/34 IPC, r/w Sections 3/4/5/6/7/9 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, Sections 4/6/17 of the POCSO Act and Section 81 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. It has been alleged by the petitioner that after the disclosure of the opposite-party being involved in such grave offences with evidence on record, the order of anticipatory bail granted needs to be set aside as the order indeed seems to be given without any application of mind and in absolute mechanical manner.

While noting the facts and circumstances along with the submission of parties, the Court stated that ‘We are pained by the laconic and casual manner in which the learned Judge chose to allow an application for pre-arrest bail in a case relating to the commercial sexual exploitation of underage girls by an organised crime racket’.

Therefore, the High Court giving due weightage to the fact that menace of trafficking of women and minors have been observed in alarming proportions and the lackadaisical manner in which these cases are investigated, the following directions need to be adhered to:

The High Court disposed of the application for cancellation of bail in accordance to the issued directions. [State of W.B v. Sangita Sahu, 2018 SCC OnLine Cal 4853, order dated 05-07-2018]

Exit mobile version