{"id":95791,"date":"2017-01-03T14:34:09","date_gmt":"2017-01-03T09:04:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=95791"},"modified":"2017-01-03T14:34:09","modified_gmt":"2017-01-03T09:04:09","slug":"3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/","title":{"rendered":"3 Copyright Societies restrained from issuing licences for breach of Section 33 of Copyright Act, 1957"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong> In a matter where the petitioner sought writ of mandamus directing the respondents to hold an enquiry against the supposed Copyright Societies for having violated the provisions of Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957, the Single Bench of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. held that since the respondents had already initiated an inquiry and were taking action vis-a-vis the Societies, not registered in terms of Section 33 of the Act; till the next date of hearing, the said copyright societies were restrained from acting in contravention of Section 33 of the Act and the respondents were directed to take action against them in accordance with law for breach of provisions of Section 33.<\/p>\n

As per Section 33 of the Act, no person or association of persons can, after coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1994 (which was notified on 10.05.1995), inter alia commence or, carry on the business of issuing or granting licences in respect of any work in which copyright subsists. As per the petitioner, the Copyright Societies’ registration lapsed on 31.06.2013 and, thereafter, they were not granted fresh registration and, as per the information of the petitioner, one of them was never registered as Copyright Society. It was further contended that the said respondents continued to function in violation of the Section 33 of the Act and were issuing and granting licences in respect of copyrighted work of which they did not hold the copyright.<\/p>\n

The respondents submitted that appropriate inquiry had already been initiated and interim steps had been taken inasmuch as, a public notice had been displayed on the website of the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, informing public that the societies were no longer registered as Copyright Societies.\u00a0The matter is scheduled to be next heard on 24.04.2017. [M\/S Event And Entertainment Management Association (EEMA) v. Union Of India, 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6532<\/a>, order dated 23.12.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: In a matter where the petitioner sought writ of mandamus directing the respondents to hold an enquiry against the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[12661,12651],"class_list":["post-95791","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-copyright-amendment-act","tag-copyright-societies"],"yoast_head":"\n3 Copyright Societies restrained from issuing licences for breach of Section 33 of Copyright Act, 1957 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"3 Copyright Societies restrained from issuing licences for breach of Section 33 of Copyright Act, 1957\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: In a matter where the petitioner sought writ of mandamus directing the respondents to hold an enquiry against the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-01-03T09:04:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/\",\"name\":\"3 Copyright Societies restrained from issuing licences for breach of Section 33 of Copyright Act, 1957 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-01-03T09:04:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"3 Copyright Societies restrained from issuing licences for breach of Section 33 of Copyright Act, 1957\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"3 Copyright Societies restrained from issuing licences for breach of Section 33 of Copyright Act, 1957 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"3 Copyright Societies restrained from issuing licences for breach of Section 33 of Copyright Act, 1957","og_description":"Delhi High Court: In a matter where the petitioner sought writ of mandamus directing the respondents to hold an enquiry against the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-01-03T09:04:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/","name":"3 Copyright Societies restrained from issuing licences for breach of Section 33 of Copyright Act, 1957 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-01-03T09:04:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/3-copyright-societies-restrained-from-issuing-licences-for-breach-of-section-33-of-copyright-act-1957\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"3 Copyright Societies restrained from issuing licences for breach of Section 33 of Copyright Act, 1957"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":193804,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/a-critique-of-the-provisions-on-copyright-societies-under-the-copyright-act-1957\/","url_meta":{"origin":95791,"position":0},"title":"A critique of the provisions on Copyright Societies under the Copyright Act, 1957","author":"Saba","date":"March 14, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Introduction The Copyright Act, 1957 (Copyright Act) governs the law relating to copyright in India. The Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 (2012 Amendment) was enacted with an underlying objective to establish a just and equitable framework of copyright administration and revenue sharing for protecting rights of authors of works incorporated in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "OP. ED."","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/can-copyright-societies-grant-license-under-section-30-copyright-act-bombay-hc-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":95791,"position":1},"title":"Can Copyright Societies grant license under Section 30 of Copyright Act? Bombay High Court explains","author":"Ridhi","date":"February 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court explained that the 1994 amendment was introduced for protecting and facilitating the exercise of owner\u2019s rights and not restricting or diminishing them.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291158,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/03\/bombay-hc-upholds-iprs-claim-under-copyright-act-2012-amendment-against-fm-radiobroadcasters\/","url_meta":{"origin":95791,"position":2},"title":"[IPRS v. Pvt. FM Radio Broadcasters] Bombay High Court upheld royalty rights to authors of original works in cinematograph films","author":"Ridhi","date":"May 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court discussed various provisions of the original Copyright Act, 1957, its 2012 amendment, Parliamentary report and relevant cases dealt by Supreme Court and High Courts relevant to the instant claim.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":44681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/22\/iprs-forthwith-restrained-from-granting-any-licencereceiving-licence-fee-in-respect-of-chitra-singh-jagjit-singhs-works\/","url_meta":{"origin":95791,"position":3},"title":"IPRS forthwith restrained from granting any licence\/receiving licence fee in respect of Chitra Singh & Jagjit Singh’s works","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 22, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0 The issue in contention was the Jagjit Singh concert being organised by Defendants 2 and 3 in New Delhi on March 18, 2016, being publicised as a \u201clive in concert\u201d and that Jagjit Singh \u201csings again for charity\u201d. The plaintiff, Chitra Jagjit Singh, wife of the famous\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":72221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/22\/section-14a-of-copyright-act-1957-cannot-be-interpreted-to-mean-that-the-right-of-producer-of-sound-recording-to-communicate-his-work-to-the-public-under-section-14eiii-of-the-act-is-lost\/","url_meta":{"origin":95791,"position":4},"title":"Section 14(a) of Copyright Act, 1957 cannot be interpreted to mean that the right of producer of sound recording to communicate his work to the public under Section 14(e)(iii) of the Act, is lost","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 22, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Court, while deciding the question as to whether the Event Management Company\/Event Organizer is required to seek licence from the lyricist and the musician for subsequently playing the song in public even after it has paid for the broadcasting of the song to the Sound Recording Company,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343058,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/06\/dhc-temporarily-restrains-azure-hospitality-from-playing-phonographic-performances-copyrighted-songs-in-its-restaurants\/","url_meta":{"origin":95791,"position":5},"title":"Delhi HC temporarily restrains Azure Hospitality from playing Phonographic Performance’s copyrighted songs without license in its restaurants\/bars","author":"Arushi","date":"March 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The act of the defendants of playing the sound recordings in their restaurants\/bars, for which the plaintiff holds the copyright would, on a prima facie view, amount to infringement of the plaintiff\u2019s copyright in terms of Section 51 of the Copyright Act, 1957.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=95791"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95791\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=95791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=95791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=95791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}