{"id":95211,"date":"2016-12-28T15:26:36","date_gmt":"2016-12-28T09:56:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=95211"},"modified":"2017-02-03T10:49:33","modified_gmt":"2017-02-03T05:19:33","slug":"direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/","title":{"rendered":"Direction to pay 85% of current value of property along with 18% interest for misplacing sale deed, not proper"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):<\/strong>\u00a0While rendering relief to Life Insurance Corporation Housing Finance company, NCDRC set aside the order of U.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, vide which LIC Housing Finance was directed to pay 85% of the current value of a property along with interest and punitive damages as well as the cost of litigation, to the complainant for misplacing sale deed of the house mortgaged by him in 1998 against two loan amounts of Rs 4 lakh and Rs 5 lakh, respectively. NCDRC found the compensation excessive and reduced it to Rs. 5 lakhs for the loss of the sale deed and Rs. 20,000 as cost of litigation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Earlier, the complainant had taken Rs 4.75 lakh loan from the Company in April, 1998 and delivered the original sale deed of his house in Vishal Khand, Gomtinagar as \u201cequitable mortgage\u201d. The housing finance company, in December 2003, issued a certificate informing that the original sale deed of the mortgage was \u201cmisplaced\u201d. Under the same \u201cequitable mortgage\u201d deal, LIC Housing Finance had later loaned Rs 5 lakh to the complainant. The complainant repaid the loan in February, 2004 and got the NOC issued in August, 2006. The LIC Housing Finance, at that time too, said it had misplaced the original documents of the house. A year later, when the complainant asked for the original registry, the LIC maintained it had misplaced the papers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The complainant approached the State Commission pleading to recover original documents of the property from LIC Housing and urged for a compensation of Rs 24 lakhs. State Commission ordered payment of 85% of the current value of the property along with 18% interest and Rs.5 lakhs as punitive damages and Rs.20,000\/- as cost of litigation. Before NCDRC, LIC Housing Finance stated that they were not in a position to return the said document as it had been misplaced but they had already taken various measures like making publication in the newspaper, obtaining a certified copy of the documents etc. They had even decided to advance second loan of Rs. 5 lakhs to the complainant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">After perusal of relevant material on record and referring to previous judgments of the Commission, NCDRC observed that the compensation allowed to the complainant is excessive. \u201cBy directing payment of 85% of the current value of the house along with 18% interest, the State Commission has ordered payment of amount almost more than double the current value of the house in question. The award of such compensation for the loss of the title deed cannot be held to be justified by any stretch of imagination. At best, the appellant\/OP-1 (LIC Housing Finance) could be given directions to compensate the complainant for the deficiency in service on their part for the loss of the said title deed,\u201d stated the Commission.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While setting aside the order of State Commission, NCDRC noted, \u201cThe appellant is directed to pay a compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 (Rupees five lakhs only) to the complainant for the loss of the sale deed within a period of four weeks from today, failing which, he shall be liable to pay interest @ 12% p.a. for the period of default in making such payment. In addition, a sum of Rs. 20,000 \u00a0is also allowed as litigation cost to the complainant.\u201d [LIC Housing Finance Co. Ltd. v. Rajeev Kumar Jain, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/brU19Ebe\">2016 SCC OnLine NCDRC 1886<\/a>, decided on December 8, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0While rendering relief to Life Insurance Corporation Housing Finance company, NCDRC set aside the order of U.P. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":199533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-95211","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Direction to pay 85% of current value of property along with 18% interest for misplacing sale deed, not proper | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Direction to pay 85% of current value of property along with 18% interest for misplacing sale deed, not proper\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0While rendering relief to Life Insurance Corporation Housing Finance company, NCDRC set aside the order of U.P.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-12-28T09:56:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-03T05:19:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/\",\"name\":\"Direction to pay 85% of current value of property along with 18% interest for misplacing sale deed, not proper | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-12-28T09:56:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-03T05:19:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Direction to pay 85% of current value of property along with 18% interest for misplacing sale deed, not proper\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Direction to pay 85% of current value of property along with 18% interest for misplacing sale deed, not proper | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Direction to pay 85% of current value of property along with 18% interest for misplacing sale deed, not proper","og_description":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0While rendering relief to Life Insurance Corporation Housing Finance company, NCDRC set aside the order of U.P.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-12-28T09:56:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-03T05:19:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/","name":"Direction to pay 85% of current value of property along with 18% interest for misplacing sale deed, not proper | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","datePublished":"2016-12-28T09:56:36+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-03T05:19:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Direction to pay 85% of current value of property along with 18% interest for misplacing sale deed, not proper"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":262305,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/24\/builder-took-money-from-homebuyer-for-formation-of-co-operative-housing-society-but-never-formed-so\/","url_meta":{"origin":95211,"position":0},"title":"Builder took money from homebuyer for formation of Co-operative Housing Society, but never formed so: Read why the homebuyer approached Commission","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (NCDRC): The Coram of R.K. Agrawal (President) and Dr S.M. Kantikar (Member) addressed a matter wherein the builder took money from the purchaser for the formation of a co-operative housing society but failed to do so and when asked for the refund, he\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301409,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/ncdrc-directs-developers-hand-over-possession-or-refund-sum-of-1-crore-home-buyer\/","url_meta":{"origin":95211,"position":1},"title":"NCDRC directs developers to hand over possession of flat or refund sum of 1 crore to a buyer","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCDRC remarked that the argument of dissolution of joint venture agreement relieving obligations of one of the opposite parties was misconceived and could not be accepted.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national consumer disputes redressal commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":56601,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/15\/muthoot-finance-pvt-ltd-asked-to-reimburse-of-current-value-of-gold-pledged-in-year-2003\/","url_meta":{"origin":95211,"position":2},"title":"Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd. asked to reimburse of current value of gold pledged in Year 2003","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 15, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): While rendering relief to a woman who failed to procure back her gold ornaments from Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd., which were pledged while taking a loan, NCDRC directed the Finance Company to reimburse the woman with the current value of 52 grams gold pledged\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6413,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/21\/persons-buying-shares-as-an-investment-are-covered-under-the-definition-of-consumer\/","url_meta":{"origin":95211,"position":3},"title":"Persons buying shares as an investment are covered under the definition of \u201cconsumer\u201d","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 21, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): NCDRC has held that though trading in shares is a commercial transaction outside the purview of Consumer Protection Act but those who buy shares as an investment are covered under the definition of \u201cconsumer\u201d. The court was hearing a revision petition filed by Venve\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300931,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/06\/ncdrc-directs-icici-bank-pay-25-lakhs-compensation-lost-property-documents\/","url_meta":{"origin":95211,"position":4},"title":"NCDRC directs ICICI bank to pay 25 lakhs compensation over lost property documents","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe issue is not of fixing a value to a piece of real estate which the complainant is in possession of. Rather, it is one of compensation for the deficiency in service and of indemnifying the complaint against any future loss.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national consumer disputes redressal commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218376,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/19\/ncdrc-jet-airways-directed-to-compensate-with-rs-1-lakh-passenger-on-failing-to-intimate-the-change-in-scheduled-time\/","url_meta":{"origin":95211,"position":5},"title":"NCDRC | Jet Airways directed to compensate a passenger with Rs 1 lakh on failing to intimate the change in scheduled time","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (NCDRC): Justice V.K. Jain, Presiding Member, directed Jet Airways India Limited to pay a sum of Rs 1 lakh as compensation for failing to inform the complainant about the change of time. Complainant is a doctor by profession, who booked an air ticket\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95211","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=95211"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95211\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/199533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=95211"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=95211"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=95211"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}