{"id":94931,"date":"2016-12-27T11:49:30","date_gmt":"2016-12-27T06:19:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=94931"},"modified":"2017-02-27T16:09:37","modified_gmt":"2017-02-27T10:39:37","slug":"brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/","title":{"rendered":"Brother of government servant, if aged 18 years and above at the time of nomination, cannot be construed as &#8216;family member&#8217; eligible for pensionary benefits"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madras High Court:<\/strong> Dismissing a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution \u00a0against the order of the District judge denying pensionary benefits to the petitioner, the Bench of M. Sathyanarayanan and Nisha Banu, JJ. held that as per sub-rule 5 of Rule 45 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, the petitioner herein cannot be considered as a family member unless at the time of nomination he was below the age of 18 years and admittedly it was not so.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was nominated by his sister, who was employed as Grade I Bench Clerk in Tamil Nadu Judicial Ministerial Services, as legal heir and had also executed a registered will by appointing him to succeed her estate in respect of the receipt of the said service benefits. The learned counsel for the respondent invited the attention of this Court to the Rule 45(5) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules that said that the family in relation to the government servants means brothers below the age of 18 years including the step-brothers and admittedly the petitioner, even at the time of nomination, has crossed that age and as such, he cannot be given pensionary benefits. While the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner vehemently submitted that in terms of Rule 48 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, the petitioner fell under the category of specified nominee.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the considered opinion of this Court, the said stand of the petitioner lacked merits and substance for the reasons that the proviso should be read in consonance with the main provision and it could not fall on exception. It further noted that in the light of the definition of family members under Rule 45(5), Rule 48 should be read in consonance with Rule 45 and therefore, the petitioner herein cannot be construed as a family member, though he was nominated along with his brother-in-law, who was no more. [B. Senthil Kumar v. The District and Sessions Judge, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_Mad_10391\">2016 SCC OnLine Mad 10391<\/a>, decided on 14.11.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court: Dismissing a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution \u00a0against the order of the District judge denying pensionary <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[12431,12441,12451],"class_list":["post-94931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-family-member","tag-pensionary-benefits","tag-tamil-nadu-pension-rules"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Brother of government servant, if aged 18 years and above at the time of nomination, cannot be construed as &#039;family member&#039; eligible for pensionary benefits | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Brother of government servant, if aged 18 years and above at the time of nomination, cannot be construed as &#039;family member&#039; eligible for pensionary benefits\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madras High Court: Dismissing a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution \u00a0against the order of the District judge denying pensionary\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-12-27T06:19:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-27T10:39:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/\",\"name\":\"Brother of government servant, if aged 18 years and above at the time of nomination, cannot be construed as 'family member' eligible for pensionary benefits | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-12-27T06:19:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-27T10:39:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Brother of government servant, if aged 18 years and above at the time of nomination, cannot be construed as &#8216;family member&#8217; eligible for pensionary benefits\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Brother of government servant, if aged 18 years and above at the time of nomination, cannot be construed as 'family member' eligible for pensionary benefits | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Brother of government servant, if aged 18 years and above at the time of nomination, cannot be construed as 'family member' eligible for pensionary benefits","og_description":"Madras High Court: Dismissing a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution \u00a0against the order of the District judge denying pensionary","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-12-27T06:19:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-27T10:39:37+00:00","author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/","name":"Brother of government servant, if aged 18 years and above at the time of nomination, cannot be construed as 'family member' eligible for pensionary benefits | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-12-27T06:19:30+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-27T10:39:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Brother of government servant, if aged 18 years and above at the time of nomination, cannot be construed as &#8216;family member&#8217; eligible for pensionary benefits"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":321230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/02\/retrospective-re-fixation-salary-pensionary-benefits-post-retirement-not-accordance-law-madras-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":94931,"position":0},"title":"Retrospective re-fixation of salary and pensionary benefits post-retirement is not in accordance with law: Madras HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner was retired from service by superannuation and hence, the employer - employee relationship between the petitioner and the University had come to an end and hence, the University holds no Authority to re-fix the salary and the consequential benefits of the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343256,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-rejects-pension-plea-police-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":94931,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Qualifying service lost significance due to dismissal\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC rejects pension plea of police officer dismissed from service in 1999","author":"Editor","date":"March 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf pension was extended on the basis of length of service, the order of dismissal or removal from service would become meaningless.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":375528,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/12\/madras-hc-resignation-on-medical-grounds-entails-forfeiture-of-service\/","url_meta":{"origin":94931,"position":2},"title":"Resignation on medical grounds entails forfeiture of service: Madras HC clarifies distinction between resignation and voluntary retirement","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"February 12, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe resignation of an employee entails forfeiture of service, and a clear distinction can be drawn between resignation and voluntary retirement, as both are disparate in terms of their operation and consequence, and therefore unlikely to hold an equivalent character.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"resignation on medical grounds","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/resignation-on-medical-grounds.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/resignation-on-medical-grounds.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/resignation-on-medical-grounds.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/resignation-on-medical-grounds.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357771,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/25\/ph-hc-equating-disability-with-inefficiency-is-terribly-apathetic\/","url_meta":{"origin":94931,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Equating disability with inefficiency is terribly apathetic\u2019; P&amp;H HC orders Department to grant pensionary benefits accrued to deceased husband","author":"Editor","date":"August 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"An arbitrary review of a predecessor\u2019s order is impermissible in law if the same is not void or contrary to the statutory provisions.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"equating disability with inefficiency","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/equating-disability-with-inefficiency.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/equating-disability-with-inefficiency.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/equating-disability-with-inefficiency.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/equating-disability-with-inefficiency.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196683,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/05\/petitioner-granted-pensionary-benefits-after-25-years-in-light-of-being-an-illiterate-widow\/","url_meta":{"origin":94931,"position":4},"title":"Petitioner granted pensionary benefits after 25 years in light of being an illiterate widow","author":"Saba","date":"June 5, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: A civil writ petition praying for granting pensionary benefits to the petitioner after 25 years of death of her husband, was allowed by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ. The husband of the petitioner who retired from Assam Rifles, had died in 1993.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":304500,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/bsf-personnel-cannot-treated-ex-servicemen-benefits-purchase-consumption-liquor-tamil-nadu-madras-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":94931,"position":5},"title":"Can retired BSF personnel be treated as &#8216;Ex-Servicemen&#8217; for benefits of purchase and consumption of liquor in Tamil Nadu? Madras HC answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cEven if the claim of the petitioner that discrimination is meted out to retired personnel of BSF as against Ex-servicemen has to be accepted, the consequence would only be that the exemption and concession granted to Ex-servicemen in consumption of liquor would have to be withdrawn, but, it cannot be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94931\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}