{"id":94681,"date":"2016-12-26T11:43:25","date_gmt":"2016-12-26T06:13:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=94681"},"modified":"2017-02-27T16:07:18","modified_gmt":"2017-02-27T10:37:18","slug":"decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/","title":{"rendered":"Decision with respect to legalization of euthanasia lies with the South African Parliament rather than the Judges"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa:<\/strong> While deciding the present case wherein the legality of an order by the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria to allow physician assisted euthanasia to a dying cancer patient, was debated, the Court held that it is the forte of the Legislature to introduce laws in respect of legalizing physician assisted suicide\/euthanasia, and that the present case in not appropriate for the Court to develop the common law of murder and culpable homicide.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The applicant who was dying of cancer, approached the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria claiming an order that a medical practitioner could either end his life by administering a lethal substance, or provide him with the lethal substance to enable him to administer it himself, and that in the event if a medical practitioner must end his life, then such medical practitioner would not be subjected to prosecution or disciplinary steps by the relevant professional body. Furthermore the applicant as seeking the above relief as matter of right as enshrined in the Bill of Rights under the Constitution also sought an order that the common law in relation to the crimes of murder and culpable homicide should be developed in terms of Section 39(2) of the Constitution of South Africa. The applicant was allowed by the High Court to go for physician assisted euthanasia; unfortunately however the applicant died 2 hours prior to the passing of the Order. The High Court however refused to recall the Order stating that it\u2019s Order had extensive societal implications, upon which then the State decided to prefer an appeal to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Perusing the facts and the arguments for and against legalizing euthanasia, and also looking upon the complexities involved in the issue, the Court discussed the laws, the precedents regarding the issue. The Court further took notice of various countries wherein extensive laws have been laid down in respect of euthanasia, most particularly Netherlands and the State of Oregon, USA. However the Court noted that the separation of powers requires that Parliament should decide any changes on the law rather than requiring judges to do so. The Court further observed that the South African situation, social values and social-economic and political conditions are very different from the jurisdictions where euthanasia has been legalized. The Court also stated that the High Court was hasty in deciding the case and did not properly consider the South African law or international precedent cases and was wrong to assume that the common law on murder needs to be changed to accommodate assisted suicide and euthanasia. [Minister of Justice and Correctional Services v. Estate Stransham-Ford,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/38a7q434\"> 2016 SCC OnLine ZASCA 46<\/a> : 2016 ZASCA 197, decided on 06.12.2016]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa: While deciding the present case wherein the legality of an order by the High Court <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":39761,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[12411,12421,2528],"class_list":["post-94681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-common-law","tag-culpable-homicide","tag-Euthanasia"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Decision with respect to legalization of euthanasia lies with the South African Parliament rather than the Judges | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Decision with respect to legalization of euthanasia lies with the South African Parliament rather than the Judges\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa: While deciding the present case wherein the legality of an order by the High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-12-26T06:13:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-27T10:37:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/\",\"name\":\"Decision with respect to legalization of euthanasia lies with the South African Parliament rather than the Judges | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-12-26T06:13:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-27T10:37:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Decision with respect to legalization of euthanasia lies with the South African Parliament rather than the Judges\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Decision with respect to legalization of euthanasia lies with the South African Parliament rather than the Judges | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Decision with respect to legalization of euthanasia lies with the South African Parliament rather than the Judges","og_description":"Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa: While deciding the present case wherein the legality of an order by the High Court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-12-26T06:13:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-27T10:37:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/","name":"Decision with respect to legalization of euthanasia lies with the South African Parliament rather than the Judges | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","datePublished":"2016-12-26T06:13:25+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-27T10:37:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/26\/decision-with-respect-to-legalization-of-euthanasia-lies-with-the-south-african-parliament-rather-than-the-judges\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Decision with respect to legalization of euthanasia lies with the South African Parliament rather than the Judges"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":33311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/20\/four-month-extension-to-the-suspension-on-the-invalidity-of-sections-241b-and-14-dealing-with-physician-assisted-euthanasia-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":94681,"position":0},"title":"Four month extension to the suspension on the invalidity of Sections 241(b) and 14, dealing with physician- assisted euthanasia, granted","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 20, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Canada: While deliberating upon the question that whether the Court should grant six-month extension to the suspension on the invalidity of Sections 241(b) and 14 of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, dealing with physician- assisted euthanasia; the 9 Judge Bench of the Court headed by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Canada SC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239750,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/28\/euthanasia-indian-view\/","url_meta":{"origin":94681,"position":1},"title":"Euthanasia &#8212; Indian View\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Achal Gupta*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/indian-2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/indian-2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/indian-2.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/indian-2.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/indian-2.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215892,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/19\/breaking-australian-state-victoria-legalises-voluntary-euthanasia-for-terminally-ill-patients\/","url_meta":{"origin":94681,"position":2},"title":"Breaking |  Australian State Victoria legalises &#8220;Voluntary Euthanasia&#8221; for terminally ill patients","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"As reported by media, Terminally ill patients can now for the first time apply to end their own life, after new laws went into effect in the state of Victoria in Australia. From 19-06-2019, Victoria residents will be able to request access to a voluntary assisted dying scheme. According to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/euthanasia.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/euthanasia.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/euthanasia.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/euthanasia.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/euthanasia.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":37801,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/01\/euthanasia-canadian-perspective\/","url_meta":{"origin":94681,"position":3},"title":"Euthanasia \u2013 Canadian perspective","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"By Vidya Sagar","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Canada SC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326274,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/delhi-hc-dismisses-plea-refer-thirty-year-old-mans-case-medical-board-consider-passive-euthanasia\/","url_meta":{"origin":94681,"position":4},"title":"Delhi HC dismisses plea to refer thirty-year-old man\u2019s case to medical board for consideration of passive euthanasia","author":"Editor","date":"July 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated the petitioner is living and no one, including a physician, is permitted to cause death of another person by administering any lethal drug, even if the objective was to relieve the patient from pain and suffering.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":193877,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/09\/breaking-passive-euthanasia-permissible-human-beings-fundamental-right-die-dignity-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":94681,"position":5},"title":"Passive Euthanasia is permissible; Human beings have a fundamental right to die with dignity: Supreme Court [Full Report]","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: \u201cWhy should I fear death? If I am, then death is not. If death is, then I am not. Why should I fear that which can only exist when I do not?\u201d - Epicurus This is one of the several profound quotes quoted by the Constitution Bench in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94681"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94681\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39761"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}