{"id":94061,"date":"2016-12-21T17:14:30","date_gmt":"2016-12-21T11:44:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=94061"},"modified":"2017-01-12T16:16:47","modified_gmt":"2017-01-12T10:46:47","slug":"parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"Parties entitled to approach the Court again, where the law is altered since the earlier decision"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong> While considering a petition for the appointment of a sole neutral arbitrator in connection with a dispute between two parties on which an earlier petition had been dismissed by the Court, the Single Bench of Vibhu Bakhru, J. held that solely because an earlier petition on similar grounds has been dismissed, the present petition cannot be rejected since the matter in issue is not the same as in the previous proceeding, because the law interpreted is different and amended.<\/p>\n

In the present case, the petitioners invoked the arbitration clause in case of a dispute between the parties and sought appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes. The respondents suggested persons who were their own employees, because of which the petitioners doubted rendering of a fair and impartial decision by them. Also, one of their earlier petitions for similar reliefs had been rejected by the Supreme Court, and therefore the respondents opposed the present petition.<\/p>\n

This Court, while admitting the petition, appointed an independent and neutral arbitrator saying that even if the arbitration clause in the contract entered into between the parties allows the appointment of an arbitrator who would otherwise be ineligible by virtue of him being an employee of the other company, such an arbitrator is not empowered to settle the dispute in view of the Arbitration and Reconciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. Subsequently, it also held that the amended law would apply to the proceedings as the parties had expressly agreed to make applicable any statutory modifications. [Madhava Hytech-Rani v. Ircon International Limited, 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6326<\/a>, decided on 19.12.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: While considering a petition for the appointment of a sole neutral arbitrator in connection with a dispute between two <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-94061","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nParties entitled to approach the Court again, where the law is altered since the earlier decision | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parties entitled to approach the Court again, where the law is altered since the earlier decision\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: While considering a petition for the appointment of a sole neutral arbitrator in connection with a dispute between two\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-12-21T11:44:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-12T10:46:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/\",\"name\":\"Parties entitled to approach the Court again, where the law is altered since the earlier decision | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-12-21T11:44:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-12T10:46:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parties entitled to approach the Court again, where the law is altered since the earlier decision\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parties entitled to approach the Court again, where the law is altered since the earlier decision | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parties entitled to approach the Court again, where the law is altered since the earlier decision","og_description":"Delhi High Court: While considering a petition for the appointment of a sole neutral arbitrator in connection with a dispute between two","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-12-21T11:44:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-12T10:46:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/","name":"Parties entitled to approach the Court again, where the law is altered since the earlier decision | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-12-21T11:44:30+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-12T10:46:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/21\/parties-entitled-to-approach-the-court-again-where-the-law-is-altered-since-the-earlier-decision\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parties entitled to approach the Court again, where the law is altered since the earlier decision"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":375099,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/theres-distinction-between-claim-to-be-made-and-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-act-to-be-filed-ph-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":94061,"position":0},"title":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 | Time-Barred Claim \u2260 Time-Barred Section 11 Petition: Punjab and Haryana High Court appoints Second Arbitrator","author":"Shriya Singh","date":"February 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe issue with regard to the time barred claim is not to be gone into at the reference stage under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 but can be seen only by the Arbitrator\/Arbitration Tribunal at the relevant stage.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"claim to be made and petition under Section 11 Arbitration Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/claim-to-be-made-and-petition-under-Section-11-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/claim-to-be-made-and-petition-under-Section-11-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/claim-to-be-made-and-petition-under-Section-11-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/claim-to-be-made-and-petition-under-Section-11-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":351518,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/26\/gau-hc-appoints-arbitrator-lottery-printing-dispute-nagaland-govt\/","url_meta":{"origin":94061,"position":1},"title":"Gauhati High Court appoints Retd. District and Sessions Judge, Nagaland as an arbitrator in lottery printing dispute with Nagaland Government","author":"Editor","date":"June 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner submitted that it filed an arbitration petition before Punjab and Haryana High Court, as part of the agreement was executed at Chandigarh. However, the Punjab and Haryana High Court was unable to decide the petition due to territorial bar. Hence, the present petition is filed.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"arbitrator lottery printing dispute","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/arbitrator-lottery-printing-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/arbitrator-lottery-printing-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/arbitrator-lottery-printing-dispute.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/arbitrator-lottery-printing-dispute.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":168604,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/appointment-arbitrator-court-s-116-arbitration-conciliation-act-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":94061,"position":2},"title":"Appointment of arbitrator by Court under S. 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act explained","author":"Saba","date":"November 15, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While deciding a civil petition under Section 11(6) and (8) read with Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Vineet Kothari, J. dismissed the petition holding that the essentials required for exercise of Court\u2019s power under S. 11(6) of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":287070,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/arbitration-petition-calcutta-high-court-appointment-arbitrator-disqualification-section-12-seventh-schedule-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-legal-research-news-scc-online-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":94061,"position":3},"title":"All unilateral appointments of arbitrators are not invalid: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that all the unilateral appointment of arbitrators is not invalid unless the arbitrator's relationship falls within the Seventh Schedule to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328404,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/","url_meta":{"origin":94061,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Necessary ingredients of Sec. 11(6) clearly exist\u2019; Delhi HC appoints Arbitrator to resolve dispute between Yuvraj Singh and real estate developer for claim of Rs. 1.38 Crores","author":"Editor","date":"August 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDeletion of party is an issue to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal, it cannot be looked into by the Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300002,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/rajasthan-hc-appointed-arbitrator-bank-guarantee-forfeited-consideration-force-majeure-clause\/","url_meta":{"origin":94061,"position":5},"title":"Rajasthan High Court appoints sole arbitrator where performance security was forfeited without considering force majeure clause","author":"Editor","date":"August 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court exercised the powers conferred under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and appointed, Jai Prakash Narayan Purohit, Retired Additional District Judge, as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94061","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94061"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94061\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94061"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94061"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94061"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}