{"id":93961,"date":"2016-12-22T10:03:57","date_gmt":"2016-12-22T04:33:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=93961"},"modified":"2017-02-27T15:56:19","modified_gmt":"2017-02-27T10:26:19","slug":"live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/","title":{"rendered":"Live-in partners not entitled to protection if one of the partner has a subsisting marriage"},"content":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court:<\/strong> In a case before the Court dealing with the right to live-in relationship, Suneet Kumar, J. observed that when a person enters into a relationship with another who is married and such marriage has not been dissolved by any competent court, then such a relationship cannot be granted protection.<\/p>\n

In this case, one of the petitioners was already married against her wishes. Subsequently she had a live-in relationship with the other petitioner for five years,and later eloped with intention to marry. Therefore, she and her partner sought protection since they claimed to have a right to live-in relationship.\u00a0This Court, analyzing the case on the lines of the Supreme Court’s ratio in Indra Sarma<\/em> v. V.K.V. Sarma<\/em>, (2013) 15 SCC 755<\/a>, held that the petitioners entered into a relationship knowing fully well the marital status of each other. Since the woman’s marriage had not yet been dissolved by any competent court as on date, therefore, such a relationship could be granted any protection and would therefore not be covered under Section 2(f) of the Domestic Violence Act to fall within the expression relationship “in the nature of marriage”. [Kusum v. State of U.P., 2016 SCC OnLine All 988<\/a>, decided on 09.11.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court: In a case before the Court dealing with the right to live-in relationship, Suneet Kumar, J. observed that when <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[12291,12271,12281],"class_list":["post-93961","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-entitlement-to-protection","tag-live-in-partner","tag-subsisting-marriage"],"yoast_head":"\nLive-in partners not entitled to protection if one of the partner has a subsisting marriage | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Live-in partners not entitled to protection if one of the partner has a subsisting marriage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: In a case before the Court dealing with the right to live-in relationship, Suneet Kumar, J. observed that when\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-12-22T04:33:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-27T10:26:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/\",\"name\":\"Live-in partners not entitled to protection if one of the partner has a subsisting marriage | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-12-22T04:33:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-27T10:26:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Live-in partners not entitled to protection if one of the partner has a subsisting marriage\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Live-in partners not entitled to protection if one of the partner has a subsisting marriage | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Live-in partners not entitled to protection if one of the partner has a subsisting marriage","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: In a case before the Court dealing with the right to live-in relationship, Suneet Kumar, J. observed that when","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-12-22T04:33:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-27T10:26:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/","name":"Live-in partners not entitled to protection if one of the partner has a subsisting marriage | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-12-22T04:33:57+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-27T10:26:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/live-in-partners-not-entitled-to-protection-if-one-of-the-partner-has-a-subsisting-marriage\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Live-in partners not entitled to protection if one of the partner has a subsisting marriage"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":367499,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/all-hc-denies-protection-to-live-in-couple-without-dissolution-of-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":93961,"position":0},"title":"Protection to live-in couple without dissolution of marriage would amount to protection against bigamy: Allahabad High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, two adults were living in a live-in relationship and the women involved was a legally wedded wife of another man and their marriage was not dissolved yet.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Protection to live-in couple without dissolution of marriage","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Protection-to-live-in-couple-without-dissolution-of-marriage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Protection-to-live-in-couple-without-dissolution-of-marriage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Protection-to-live-in-couple-without-dissolution-of-marriage.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Protection-to-live-in-couple-without-dissolution-of-marriage.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325190,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/27\/madras-hc-live-in-relationship-married-adult-unmarried-adult-not-in-nature-of-marriage-giving-rights-to-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":93961,"position":1},"title":"Live-in-Relationship between married adult and unmarried adult is not in \u2018nature of marriage\u2019 giving rights to parties: Madras HC","author":"Editor","date":"June 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court has observed that by entering such a relationship, the appellant has committed an intentional tort, namely interference in the marital relationship with intentionally alienating him from his wife and children","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300568,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/allahabad-hc-grants-bail-to-accused-raping-live-in-partner-under-false-promise-to-marry\/","url_meta":{"origin":93961,"position":2},"title":"Allahabad High Court grants bail to man accused of raping live-in partner under false promise to marry","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe british concept of changing partner in every season cannot be considered to be hallmark of a stable and healthy society. The security and stability which the institution of marriage provides to an individual's life cannot be expected from live-in-relationship.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/16\/chc-upholds-maintenance-woman-live-in-relationship-unaware-of-her-partners-already-existing-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":93961,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Relationship was in nature of marriage\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC upholds maintenance for a woman in live-in relationship who was unaware of her partner\u2019s already existing marriage","author":"Arushi","date":"October 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, the woman has clearly stated that she was not aware about her partner\u2019s marriage and his children. Further, the Trial Court as well as the Appellate Court has also stated that the relationship between them, fell under the category of domestic relationship.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chhattisgarh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301811,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/18\/live-in-relationship-without-divorce-punjab-haryana-hc-reprimands-couple-seeking-police-protection\/","url_meta":{"origin":93961,"position":4},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court reprimands couple seeking police protection for live-in relationship without divorce; imposes cost for abuse of process of law","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court tagged the instant petition to be an abuse of the legal process for covering up the petitioners\u2019 illicit relationship on being caught.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338421,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/04\/punjab-haryana-hc-refuses-police-protection-plea-live-in-couple-since-one-of-them-married-with-kids\/","url_meta":{"origin":93961,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Allowing such petitions would promote bigamy\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC refuses to grant police protection to live-in couple where one of them was married & had kids","author":"Editor","date":"January 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe concept of right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India includes the right to live with dignity and the petitioners by running away from their parental home is not only bringing bad name to the family but also is violating the right\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93961","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93961"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93961\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93961"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93961"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93961"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}