{"id":93051,"date":"2016-12-16T15:16:23","date_gmt":"2016-12-16T09:46:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=93051"},"modified":"2016-12-31T17:16:08","modified_gmt":"2016-12-31T11:46:08","slug":"samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/","title":{"rendered":"Samsung-Apple design patent infringement battle remanded back to Federal Circuit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court of the United States:<\/strong> The Supreme Court of the United States on hearing a matter regarding infringement on designs matters between Apple and Samsung has reversed and remanded the matter back to the Federal Circuit for fresh consideration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts in issue are that Apple in 2011 had sued Samsung for having infringed certain design patents owned by it over its smart phone. The jury found that Samsung had indeed infringed three design patents owned by apple i.e. (a) \u2018black rectangular front face with rounded corners\u2019, (b) \u2018rectangular front face with rounded corners and a raised rim\u2019 and a (c) \u2018grid of 16 colorful icons on a black screen\u2019.\u00a0Consequently, Apple was awarded damages worth $ 399 million in accordance with Section 289 (which provided for recovery of the total profit made by an infringer from the infringement).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Federal Circuit confirmed the damages award by rejecting the contention of Samsung that an award for damages under Section 289 should be limited to the \u2018Article of Manufacture\u2019 and not the entire smart phone, on the ground that the individual components of apple in the smart phone could not be sold separately to the consumer therefore the profits made by Samsung from the entire smart phone shall be awarded to Apple. The Supreme Court of the United States found fault with the narrow construction of the Federal Circuit regarding the \u2018Article of Manufacture\u2019 by holding that even individual components in the final products could be patented. Therefore, the Federal Circuit could not dismiss the claim of Samsung on the ground that the design patents owned by Apple were indivisible from the smart phone. The Supreme Court reversed and remanded the matter by holding that the \u2018Article of Manufacture\u2019 is broad enough to embrace both a product sold to a consumer and a component of that product, whether sold separately or not. [Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. v. Apple Inc., No. 15\u2013777., decided on December 6, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of the United States: The Supreme Court of the United States on hearing a matter regarding infringement on designs matters <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":32691,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[12131,3215],"class_list":["post-93051","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-design-patent","tag-infringement"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Samsung-Apple design patent infringement battle remanded back to Federal Circuit | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Samsung-Apple design patent infringement battle remanded back to Federal Circuit\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of the United States: The Supreme Court of the United States on hearing a matter regarding infringement on designs matters\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-12-16T09:46:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-31T11:46:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/\",\"name\":\"Samsung-Apple design patent infringement battle remanded back to Federal Circuit | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-12-16T09:46:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-31T11:46:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"Supreme Court of The United States\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Samsung-Apple design patent infringement battle remanded back to Federal Circuit\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Samsung-Apple design patent infringement battle remanded back to Federal Circuit | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Samsung-Apple design patent infringement battle remanded back to Federal Circuit","og_description":"Supreme Court of the United States: The Supreme Court of the United States on hearing a matter regarding infringement on designs matters","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-12-16T09:46:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-31T11:46:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/","name":"Samsung-Apple design patent infringement battle remanded back to Federal Circuit | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","datePublished":"2016-12-16T09:46:23+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-31T11:46:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"Supreme Court of The United States"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/samsung-apple-design-patent-infringement-battle-remanded-back-to-federal-circuit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Samsung-Apple design patent infringement battle remanded back to Federal Circuit"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":136221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/12\/scotus-upholds-the-principle-of-international-patent-exhaustion\/","url_meta":{"origin":93051,"position":0},"title":"SCOTUS upholds the principle of International Patent Exhaustion","author":"Saba","date":"June 12, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the United States: While relying upon the landmark decision in Kirtsaeng v.\u00a0John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013 SCC OnLine US SC 15, the Supreme Court of United States has\u00a0held that a patentee cannot control a sold item through the patent laws since its patent rights are\u00a0exhausted in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235028,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/28\/uk-sc-whether-a-court-in-the-united-kingdom-has-jurisdiction-to-grant-an-injunction-to-restrain-the-infringement-of-a-uk-patent-detailed-report\/","url_meta":{"origin":93051,"position":1},"title":"UK SC | Whether a court in the United Kingdom has jurisdiction to grant an injunction to restrain the infringement of a UK patent? [Detailed Report]","author":"Editor","date":"August 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the United Kingdom: While deciding the instant appeal raising questions important to the international market in telecommunications such as - Whether a court in the United Kingdom has jurisdiction and may properly exercise a power, without the agreement of both parties to grant an injunction to restrain\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378149,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/delhi-hc-allows-dr-reddys-to-make-and-import-semaglutide\/","url_meta":{"origin":93051,"position":2},"title":"Delhi HC upholds rejection of Novo Nordisk\u2019s injunction plea; Allows Dr. Reddy\u2019s to manufacture and import \u2018Semaglutide\u2019","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"March 12, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cViewed from the perspective of a person in the know, it is prima facie clear that Semaglutide would be obvious from the teachings contained in the Genius Patent and that, therefore, a credible challenge to the validity of the suit patent, under Section 64(1)(f), is made out.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Semaglutide patent infringement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/blog-25-24-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/blog-25-24-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/blog-25-24-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/blog-25-24-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6524,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/12\/provision-relating-to-revocation-of-patent-under-the-patent-act-1970-interpreted\/","url_meta":{"origin":93051,"position":3},"title":"Provision relating to revocation of patent under the Patent Act, 1970 interpreted","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 12, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While interpreting the Section 64 of the Patents Act, 1970 (Act) as to whether both the remedies for revocation of patents provided in Section 64 of the Act can be availed simultaneously for the same purpose, the bench of A.K. Patnaik and Jagdish Singh Khehar, JJ held that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289272,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/12\/patent-infringement-requires-copying-only-essential-features-of-suit-patent-delhi-high-court-refuses-to-grant-injunction-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":93051,"position":4},"title":"Patent infringement requires copying only \u2018essential features\u2019 of suit patent; Delhi High Court refuses to grant injunction","author":"Aastha","date":"April 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court observed that \u201cDichotomizing the claims and the accompanying specifications is, therefore, contrary to the most fundamental canons of patent law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319605,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/06\/dhc-awards-rs-244-crore-damages-to-ericsson-against-lava-for-patent-infringement-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":93051,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court awards Rs 244 crore damages to Ericsson against Lava for infringement of its Standard Essential Patents","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The present case has highlighted the importance of maintaining a balance between protecting fair access to standardized technologies and protecting intellectual property rights.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93051","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93051"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93051\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32691"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93051"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}