{"id":91051,"date":"2016-12-13T12:11:56","date_gmt":"2016-12-13T06:41:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=91051"},"modified":"2017-02-03T18:29:31","modified_gmt":"2017-02-03T12:59:31","slug":"exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/","title":{"rendered":"Exemption of tax on capital gains cannot be granted to an undertaking showing profit on ground of its revival charted out of BIFR"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench was seized of the question whether an undertaking which was being revived by BIFR could be granted a tax exemption from capital gains. The facts in issue were a textile machinery manufacturer became sick in 2001 and the BIFR charted out a rehabilitation scheme with a twin direction to the Income Tax Directorate (a) to consider the petitioners company\u2019s request for exemption from payment of capital gains on the sale of assets and (b) to carry forward the losses incurred up to the year 2013 as against 2009. The Income Tax Directorate denied the benefit of exemption from capital gains based on certain figures projecting profit by the company in future years. The matter was remanded back by the High Court due to the fact that the income tax department should have passed a judgment keeping in mind the actual figures of profit of the undertaking rather than future projections. The matter was decided against the undertaking again upon reconsideration. The petitioner preferred a writ petition against the order of the Income Tax Directorate and challenged it on the ground of non-consideration of the sick health of the undertaking.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The broad contentions raised by the petitioners were \u2013<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(A) The Income tax directorate should have considered the fact that only because the assets exceeded the liabilities (net-worth was in profit) did not discount that the undertaking still had to make up the losses it had incurred.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(B) The BIFR scheme also envisioned the denial of capital gains exemption would make the undertaking sick again because the capital gains liability was a sum of Rs 331 Lakhs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(C) The capital gains arose after selling land only for discharging the liabilities of other companies<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(D) Section 32 of the Sick Industrial Companies Act 1985, stated that any direction issued by the authority would have an overriding effect over any provision or law barring a few exemptions. Therefore, BIFR\u2019s rehabilitation scheme (which recommended exemption of tax on capital gains) should be seriously considered.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Income Tax Directorate defended the order by contending \u2013<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(A) The undertaking of the petitioner was in profits not only in future projections but also in current actual figures \u2013 the undertaking had revived after the rehabilitation scheme in the year 2011 itself. (i.e. undertaking\u2019s assets exceeded its liabilities)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(B) The department ought not to be forced to grant an exemption on payment for the fault of the petitioners<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(C) The possibility of losses occurring after paying the tax on capital gains was a usual risk in business and could never be averted<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court partly allowed the writ petition by issuing a direction that since the petitioner\u2019s liability had not been crystallized yet, no interest on capital gains tax shall be liable for the duration the matter remained pending in court. However, the Court held that the no exemption from payment of tax on capital gains would not be illegal because the possibility of losses arising in future is a normal course of any functioning business enterprise. [Laxmi Automatic Loom Works v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_Del_6207\">2016 SCC OnLine Del 6207<\/a>, decided on 5.12.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: A Division Bench was seized of the question whether an undertaking which was being revived by BIFR could be <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[11911,11901,2649,11921],"class_list":["post-91051","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-birf","tag-capital-gains-tax","tag-exemption","tag-rehabilitation-scheme"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Exemption of tax on capital gains cannot be granted to an undertaking showing profit on ground of its revival charted out of BIFR | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Exemption of tax on capital gains cannot be granted to an undertaking showing profit on ground of its revival charted out of BIFR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench was seized of the question whether an undertaking which was being revived by BIFR could be\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-12-13T06:41:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-03T12:59:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/\",\"name\":\"Exemption of tax on capital gains cannot be granted to an undertaking showing profit on ground of its revival charted out of BIFR | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-12-13T06:41:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-03T12:59:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Exemption of tax on capital gains cannot be granted to an undertaking showing profit on ground of its revival charted out of BIFR\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Exemption of tax on capital gains cannot be granted to an undertaking showing profit on ground of its revival charted out of BIFR | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Exemption of tax on capital gains cannot be granted to an undertaking showing profit on ground of its revival charted out of BIFR","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench was seized of the question whether an undertaking which was being revived by BIFR could be","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-12-13T06:41:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-03T12:59:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/","name":"Exemption of tax on capital gains cannot be granted to an undertaking showing profit on ground of its revival charted out of BIFR | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-12-13T06:41:56+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-03T12:59:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/exemption-of-tax-on-capital-gains-cannot-be-granted-to-an-undertaking-showing-profit-on-ground-of-its-revival-charted-out-of-bifr\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Exemption of tax on capital gains cannot be granted to an undertaking showing profit on ground of its revival charted out of BIFR"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":201913,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/18\/assessee-failed-to-show-land-as-agricultural-thus-no-exemption-granted-liable-to-be-assessed\/","url_meta":{"origin":91051,"position":0},"title":"Assessee failed to show land as agricultural thus no exemption granted, liable to be assessed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A 2-Judge Bench comprising of K.Vinod Chandran and Ashok Menon, JJ. dealt with an appeal against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, where order of first appellate authority was affirmed. It was found that sale of assessee\u2019s land comes under exception of capital gains under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":353092,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/cbdt-allows-section-54ec-tax-benefits-ireda-bonds\/","url_meta":{"origin":91051,"position":1},"title":"A push towards Green Investments: IREDA bonds granted Section 54EC tax benefit status","author":"Shubhi","date":"July 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"CBDT grants Section 54EC tax-exempt status to IREDA bonds allowing up to \u20b950L capital gains exemption for investments in independent renewable energy projects.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"IREDA bonds","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/IREDA-bonds.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/IREDA-bonds.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/IREDA-bonds.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/IREDA-bonds.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6743,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/17\/advances-paid-for-purchase-of-assets-would-amount-to-utilization-of-capital-gains-under-section-54g-of-income-tax-act-1961\/","url_meta":{"origin":91051,"position":2},"title":"Advances paid for purchase of assets would amount to utilization of capital gains under Section 54G of Income Tax Act, 1961","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 17, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: \u00a0Deciding on the appeals the bench comprising of A.K. Sikri and R.F. Nariman JJ. was posed with question whether advances paid for the purchase of assets while shifting of industrial undertaking from urban area, would amount to utilization\u00a0 of capital gains, allowed as an exemption under Section 54G\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219758,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/corporate-tax-rates-slashed-to-22-for-domestic-companies-and-15-for-new-domestic-manufacturing-companies-and-other-fiscal-reliefs\/","url_meta":{"origin":91051,"position":3},"title":"Corporate tax rates slashed to 22% for domestic companies and 15% for new domestic manufacturing companies and other fiscal reliefs","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The Government has brought in the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 2019 to make certain amendments in the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the Finance (No. 2) Act 2019. This was announced by the Union Minister for Finance & Corporate Affairs Smt Nirmala Sitaraman during the Press Conference in Goa today. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264783,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/cbdt-notifies-exemption-under-section-206c1g-of-the-income-tax-act-1961\/","url_meta":{"origin":91051,"position":4},"title":"CBDT notifies exemption under section 206C(1G) of the Income tax Act, 1961","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Central Government hereby notifies that the provisions of sub-section (1G) of section 206C shall not apply to an individual who is not a resident in India in terms of clause (1) and clause (1A) of section 6 of the Act, and who is visiting India. \u00a0 [206-C. Profits and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CBDT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260727,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/28\/arcelor-mittal-nippon-steel-india-limited-to-pay-the-purchase-tax-of-rs-480-crores-as-sc-sets-aside-gujarat-hc-verdict\/","url_meta":{"origin":91051,"position":5},"title":"Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited to pay the purchase tax of Rs. 480 Crores as SC sets aside Gujarat HC verdict\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a major blow to Essar Steel Limited, now Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited), the bench of MR Shah* and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ has set aside the Gujarat High Court verdict wherein it was held that Essar was entitled to the exemption from payment of purchase tax\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-58.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-58.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-58.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-58.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-58.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91051","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91051"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91051\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91051"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}