{"id":90181,"date":"2016-12-05T11:39:17","date_gmt":"2016-12-05T06:09:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=90181"},"modified":"2016-12-26T17:01:07","modified_gmt":"2016-12-26T11:31:07","slug":"a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/","title":{"rendered":"A charge cannot be enforced against a transferee if he has had no notice of the same"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:<\/strong> While relying upon the Supreme Court decision in State of Karnataka<\/em> v. Shreyas Papers Pvt. Ltd.<\/em>, 2006 (1) SCC 615<\/a> the Division Bench comprising of S. C. Dharmadhikari, B.P. Colabawalla, JJ. held that no charge can be enforced against a property legitimately purchased for consideration by the transferee if he has had no notice, either actual or constructive, of the charge.<\/p>\n

In the instant case, when a defaulter company could not repay the loan taken from the respondent bank, the bank took physical possession of a property belonging to the defaulter company under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act and invited offers for sale of the said property. On 1st September, 2010 the petitioners placed their bid for purchasing the property at Rs. 11,00,29,000. Thereafter, a Deed of Conveyance was registered in favour of the petitioners with the Registrar of Assurances on 10th March, 2011. At the time of registration, the petitioners perused the 7\/12 extract relating to the property and learnt that there was an encumbrance of Rs.18,38,709 of the Sales Tax Department on the property. The petitioners keeping in mind the magnitude of the investment already made, accepted the conveyance with the encumbrance of the Sales Tax Department. At a later stage, the petitioners were informed by the Sales Tax Department about another claim of the Department amounting to Rs. 28 crores due on the property. In this backdrop, the petitioners filed a petition with the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing Sales Tax Department to refrain from asserting any charge on the property.<\/p>\n

The High Court referred to Section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 that provides that no charge shall be enforced against any property in the hands of a person to whom such property has been transferred for consideration and without notice of the charge. The Court noted that chronology of events clearly indicate that the purchase of the property was done by the petitioners before the alleged dues of the Sales Tax Authorities to the extent of Rs.28 crores was brought to their notice. The Court further observed that it was not even the case of the Sales Tax Department that the petitioners were either informed or had constructive knowledge of their dues, except to the extent of Rs.18,38,709. Therefore, the Court held that the Sale Tax Authorities cannot recover their dues from the Petitioners by enforcing their charge against the said property. The Court however clarified that their order and direction does not mean that the Sales Tax Authorities cannot proceed against the defaulter company. [Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd. v. Bank of Maharashtra, 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 9649<\/a>, decided on 22nd November, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court: While relying upon the Supreme Court decision in State of Karnataka v. Shreyas Papers Pvt. Ltd., 2006 (1) SCC <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-90181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nA charge cannot be enforced against a transferee if he has had no notice of the same | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A charge cannot be enforced against a transferee if he has had no notice of the same\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: While relying upon the Supreme Court decision in State of Karnataka v. Shreyas Papers Pvt. Ltd., 2006 (1) SCC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-12-05T06:09:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-26T11:31:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/\",\"name\":\"A charge cannot be enforced against a transferee if he has had no notice of the same | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-12-05T06:09:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-26T11:31:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A charge cannot be enforced against a transferee if he has had no notice of the same\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A charge cannot be enforced against a transferee if he has had no notice of the same | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A charge cannot be enforced against a transferee if he has had no notice of the same","og_description":"Bombay High Court: While relying upon the Supreme Court decision in State of Karnataka v. Shreyas Papers Pvt. Ltd., 2006 (1) SCC","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-12-05T06:09:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-26T11:31:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/","name":"A charge cannot be enforced against a transferee if he has had no notice of the same | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2016-12-05T06:09:17+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-26T11:31:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/05\/a-charge-cannot-be-enforced-against-a-transferee-if-he-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A charge cannot be enforced against a transferee if he has had no notice of the same"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":89671,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/02\/sales-tax-authorities-cannot-enforce-the-alleged-charge-on-a-property-from-the-buyer-of-the-property-if-shehe-has-had-no-notice-of-the-same\/","url_meta":{"origin":90181,"position":0},"title":"Sales Tax Authorities cannot enforce the alleged charge on a property from the buyer of the property if she\/he has had no notice of the same","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 2, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Bombay: In a case where the petitioners were charged against unanticipated dues on a property by the Sales Tax authorities long after they had purchased the property, the division bench of B. P. Colabawalla and S.C. Dharmadhikari, JJ., held that even though the property was bought on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275835,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/18\/fact-check-did-the-indian-high-court-rule-that-parents-can-take-back-gifted-property-if-they-are-ill-treated-or-harassed-by-their-children\/","url_meta":{"origin":90181,"position":1},"title":"Fact-Check: Did the “Indian High Court” rule that parents can take back gifted property if they are ill treated or harassed by their children?","author":"Nilufer Bhateja","date":"October 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"An Instagram page which goes by the name of \u201cstudypoint_01_\u201d posted a meme with the title \u201cIndian High Court ruled that parents can take back their gifted property if they are ill treated or harassed by the children\u201d. The post carried the pic of two crying and destitute elders and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Fact Checks"","block_context":{"text":"Fact Checks","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/factcheck\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/blog-image-1-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/blog-image-1-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/blog-image-1-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/blog-image-1-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/blog-image-1-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215965,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/20\/ker-hc-recovery-proceedings-in-a-co-owned-property-can-be-initiated-only-against-defaulters-share-in-such-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":90181,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | Recovery proceedings in a co-owned property can be initiated only against defaulter\u2019s share in such property","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Shaji P. Chaly, J. dismissed a petition challenging initiation of recovery proceedings against the share of the defaulter in a co-owned property. Petitioner and her husband were in joint possession of a property in Unnikkulam village. Petitioner\u2019s husband had a payment of around Rs 44 lakhs due\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":342841,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/03\/sc-held-that-rights-of-charge-holder-cannot-prevail-against-mortgagees-u-s-100-tpa-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":90181,"position":3},"title":"NRJ Series | When SC held that rights of charge-holder cannot prevail against mortgagees under Section 100 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 [(1954) 2 SCC 865]","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court's Never Reported Judgment on Section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, dating back to the year 1954.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 100 Transfer of Property Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Section-100-Transfer-of-Property-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Section-100-Transfer-of-Property-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Section-100-Transfer-of-Property-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Section-100-Transfer-of-Property-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362627,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/05\/latest-cases-company-laws-comp-cas-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":90181,"position":4},"title":"Cases Reported in Comp Cas| Latest Cases on Company Laws","author":"Shikha","date":"October 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the latest cases reported in SCC\u2019s Company Cases (Comp Cas) Volume on Resolution plan, Moratorium, Winding up and Liquidation, Directors, Notice, Banking business and much more.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Latest Cases on Company Laws","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Latest-Cases-on-Company-Laws.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Latest-Cases-on-Company-Laws.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Latest-Cases-on-Company-Laws.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Latest-Cases-on-Company-Laws.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348878,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/27\/dhc-grants-stay-on-banks-fraud-classification-based-on-resolution-plan-of-reliance-commercial-finance-ltd\/","url_meta":{"origin":90181,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants stay on Bank of India\u2019s fraud classification based on Resolution Plan of Reliance Commercial Finance Limited","author":"Arushi","date":"May 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner submitted that since Resolution Plan under the Reserve Bank of India\u2019s Prudential Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets, 2019 have already been implemented, therefore, the Bank of India ought not to have proceeded against the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90181"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90181\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}