{"id":89231,"date":"2016-12-07T18:39:26","date_gmt":"2016-12-07T13:09:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=89231"},"modified":"2016-12-28T17:14:52","modified_gmt":"2016-12-28T11:44:52","slug":"2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"2016 SCC Vol. 10 November 28, 2016 Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Associations, Societies and Clubs \u2014 Body discharging public functions but not amounting to \u201cState\u201d \u2014 BCCI:<\/strong> Root and branch reform of BCCI directed in Cricket Assn. of Bihar, (2016) 8 SCC 535, but BCCI adopted obstructionist and defiant attitude and released funds to State Cricket Associations without permission of Court-appointed Committee, hence, directions issued regarding the funds and other issues involved. [BCCI v. Cricket Assn. of Bihar, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_10_SCC_23\">(2016) 10 SCC 23<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Central Excise Act, 1944 \u2014 Ss. 11-B and 12-B \u2014 Refund \u2014 When can be claimed:<\/strong> The sine qua non for a claim for refund is that the claimant has to establish that the amount of duty of excise in relation to which such refund is claimed was paid by him and that the incidence of such duty has not been passed on by him to any other person. [CCE v. Addison &amp; Co. Ltd. , <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_10_SCC_56\">(2016) 10 SCC 56<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Companies Act, 1956 \u2014 S. 205(3) \u2014 Issue of bonus shares \u2014 Principle of fair play \u2014 Application of:<\/strong> The issue of bonus shares out of revaluation reserves when the articles of the company do not confer any such power upon Board of Directors, is impermissible. Board resolution pursuant to which bonus shares were issued in present case indicates that the real purpose for issuance of the bonus shares was to raise funds which were badly needed by the company at that point of time. Held, the purpose indicated in the resolution was a sham and a pretence inasmuch as revaluation of the existing assets of the company and issuance of bonus shares against such revaluation could not and did not generate any additional funds as the additional capital available was purely fictional or notional. [Tin Plate Dealers Assn. (P) Ltd. v. Satish Chandra Sanwalka, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_10_SCC_1\">(2016) 10 SCC 1<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 21, 32 and 226 \u2014 Human dignity \u2014 Prison Reforms:<\/strong> Directions issued to Ministry of Women and Child Development of the Government of India to expedite preparation of Model Prison Manual for Juveniles in line with Model Prison Manual, 2016. [Inhuman Conditions In 1382 Prisons (II), In Re, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_10_SCC_17\">(2016) 10 SCC 17<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 \u2014 Rr. 7 and 16 \u2014 Confidential information: Essential requisites for consideration of information as confidential are:<\/strong> (i) Designated Authority (DA) is satisfied as to the confidentiality of material and, (ii) A claim of confidentiality has been made by any of the parties supplying the information. Held, though the examples in Art. 6.5 indicate the information required to be kept confidential, yet DA is not entitled to presume such effects without any claim being made by the party supplying the information. Examples given in Art. 6.5 of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 1994 (GATT) are only meant to be a guiding factor for DA. DA, being a statutory investigator, cannot assume for himself the role of a party for the\u00a0purpose of R. 7 and claim as well as accept information to be confidential. [Union of India v. Meghmani Organics Ltd.,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_10_SCC_28\">(2016) 10 SCC 28<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Debt, Financial and Monetary Laws \u2014 Banks \u2014 Banking business \u2014 Bank guarantee\/Indemnity:<\/strong> Bank guarantee is an independent and separate contract between guarantor bank and person entitled to benefit thereof i.e. guarantee-recipient and is not qualified by the main contract on performance of obligations in the present case. Though in terms of bank guarantee, invocation thereof is permissible only against a breach of conditions in LoI (Letter of Intent), between guarantee-recipient and Bank, it has been stipulated that decision of guarantee-recipient as to breach of conditions is absolute and binding on the Bank. Hence, the moment written demand was made on bank invoking the guarantee pursuant to breach of covenants between guarantee-recipient and respondent, Bank was bound to honour the payment under the guarantee. [Gujarat Maritime Board v. Larsen &amp; Toubro Infrastructure Development Projects Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_10_SCC_46\">(2016) 10 SCC 46<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Service Law \u2014 Pension \u2014 Pension Scheme \u2014 Withdrawal of Pension Scheme:<\/strong> Although as soon as employees came to be governed by Pension Scheme a contingent right vested in them which was to crystallise upon their acquiring qualifying service for claim of pension, but such contingent right is not irrevocable in this case. In absence of any employer-employee relationship between appellant State Government and respondent employees of corporate bodies, employees\u2019 challenge to withdrawal of Pension Scheme by Government in exercise of its administrative review power and their claim for pension under that Scheme was not based on any right or obligation between the parties. Once Pension Scheme had become operational administrative review by Government was permissible and such review was based on due considerations. No right of respondent employees under Arts. 14, 16, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution violated. Legality and constitutionality of government notification revoking Pension Scheme, upheld. [State of H.P. v. Rajesh Chander Sood, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_10_SCC_77\">(2016) 10 SCC 77<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Associations, Societies and Clubs \u2014 Body discharging public functions but not amounting to \u201cState\u201d \u2014 BCCI: Root and branch reform of BCCI <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":102451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-89231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>2016 SCC Vol. 10 November 28, 2016 Part 1 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2016 SCC Vol. 10 November 28, 2016 Part 1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Associations, Societies and Clubs \u2014 Body discharging public functions but not amounting to \u201cState\u201d \u2014 BCCI: Root and branch reform of BCCI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-12-07T13:09:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-28T11:44:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/\",\"name\":\"2016 SCC Vol. 10 November 28, 2016 Part 1 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-12-07T13:09:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-28T11:44:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2016 SCC Vol. 10 November 28, 2016 Part 1\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2016 SCC Vol. 10 November 28, 2016 Part 1 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2016 SCC Vol. 10 November 28, 2016 Part 1","og_description":"Associations, Societies and Clubs \u2014 Body discharging public functions but not amounting to \u201cState\u201d \u2014 BCCI: Root and branch reform of BCCI","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-12-07T13:09:26+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-28T11:44:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/","name":"2016 SCC Vol. 10 November 28, 2016 Part 1 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","datePublished":"2016-12-07T13:09:26+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-28T11:44:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/07\/2016-scc-vol-10-november-28-2016-part-1\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2016 SCC Vol. 10 November 28, 2016 Part 1"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":57142,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/19\/no-minister-and-civil-servant-can-become-member-in-the-bcci\/","url_meta":{"origin":89231,"position":0},"title":"Cricket does not flourish due to Ministers and Public Servants holding offices in State Associations or BCCI","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 19, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0The bench comprising of T.S. Thakur CJI and FM Ibrahim Kalifulla J. accepts Justice RM Lodha panel\u2019s recommendations almost in toto on structural reforms in the BCCI in order to streamline the working of the BCCI and possibly prevent any aberrations or controversies in which it has been embroiled\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":77671,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/10\/bcci-admonished-for-releasing-crores-of-rupees-in-favour-of-state-cricket-associations-without-justice-lodha-committees-permission\/","url_meta":{"origin":89231,"position":1},"title":"BCCI admonished for releasing crores of rupees in favour of State Cricket Associations without Justice Lodha Committee\u2019s permission","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 10, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In furtherance of the order dated 18.07.2016, where the Court, while accepting the report submitted by Justice Lodha Committee and the recommendations made therein, had requested the Committee to supervise the transition from the old to the new system in the wake of the reforms proposed by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":91431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/2016-scc-vol-10-december-7-2016-part-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":89231,"position":2},"title":"2016 SCC Vol. 10 December 7, 2016 Part 2","author":"Saba","date":"December 13, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Associations, Societies and Clubs \u2014 Body discharging public functions but not amounting to \u201cState\u201d \u2014 BCCI: Due to obstructionist and defiant attitude of BCCI towards reform of BCCI and supervision of transition by Court appointed Committee, as suggested by Justice Lodha Committee and affirmed in Cricket Assn. of Bihar, (2016)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":80701,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/21\/sc-freezes-bccis-financial-powers-appoints-independent-auditor\/","url_meta":{"origin":89231,"position":3},"title":"BCCI barred from making any disbursements of funds to State Associations; independent auditor to be appointed to scrutinize the income and expenditure","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 21, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench of T.S. Thakur, CJ and A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ directed that BCCI shall forthwith cease and desist from making any disbursement of funds for any purpose whatsoever to any state association until and unless the state association concerned adopts a resolution undertaking to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":96381,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/02\/anurag-thakur-removed-as-bcci-president-ajay-shirke-removed-as-bcci-secretary\/","url_meta":{"origin":89231,"position":4},"title":"Anurag Thakur removed as BCCI President, Ajay Shirke removed as BCCI Secretary","author":"SM","date":"January 2, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Directing that Anurag Thakur, President of BCCI and Ajay Shirke, Secretary, BCCI shall forthwith cease and desist from being associated with the working of BCCI, the 3-Judge Bench of T.S. Thakur, CJ and A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ accepted the norms laid down by the Lodha\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":77993,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/13\/2016-scc-vol-8-october-7-2016-part-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":89231,"position":5},"title":"2016 SCC Vol. 8 October 7, 2016 Part 4","author":"Saba","date":"October 13, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Arbitration Act, 1940 \u2014 Ss. 28, 30, 33, 3 and Sch. I, Cl. 3: It is mandatory to complete arbitration proceedings within time stipulated by statute. Time-limit of four months has been prescribed under statute. Strict adherence must be given to the said time-limit, in absence of agreement between parties\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89231"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89231\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/102451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}