{"id":87421,"date":"2016-11-26T17:14:47","date_gmt":"2016-11-26T11:44:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=87421"},"modified":"2016-12-07T16:14:23","modified_gmt":"2016-12-07T10:44:23","slug":"2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/","title":{"rendered":"2016 SCC Vol. 9 November 21, 2016 Part 5"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 32 \u2014 Scope of interference under \u2014 Ex debito justitiae jurisdiction:<\/strong> Principle of ex debito justitiae is founded on a recognition of a debt that justice delivery system owes to a litigant to correct an error in a judicial dispensation. Its application, by the very nature of things, cannot be made to depend on varying perceptions of legal omissions and commissions but such recognition of the debt which have the potential of opening new vistas of exercise of jurisdiction to relook concluded cases, must rest on surer foundations. Principle of ex debito justitiae invoked on behalf of writ petitioner-accused, to invoke jurisdiction of Supreme Court under Art. 32 to set him at liberty when he had been convicted under S. 3, TADA Act &amp; Ss. 302\/120-B IPC and sentenced, inter alia, to undergo life imprisonment, by Supreme Court. Review petition filed thereagainst was also dismissed. Instant writ petition sought interference with aforesaid order of conviction and sentence imposed on petitioner. Writ petition, held, not maintainable. [Ashiq Hussain Faktoo v. Union of India,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_9_SCC_739\"> (2016) 9 SCC 739<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Constitution of India \u2014 Sch. VII List I Entry 66 and List III Entry 25 \u2014 Medical colleges \u2014 Admissions to postgraduate courses:<\/strong> No authority can enact any other law or executive instructions to undermine Central Regulations framed under Sch. VII List I Entry 66 of the Constitution. Regns. 9(4) and (7), MCI Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000 [as amended by Noti. dt. 15-2-2012 and made applicable from academic year 2013-2014] (being such Regulations) did not provide for any reservation for in-service government doctors in PG degree courses (reservation was permissible for PG diploma courses only) but State Government by Order dt. 28-2-2014 providing said reservation for PG degree courses, held, illegal. Hence, High Court order setting aside said State Government order dt. 28-2-2014, upheld. [State of U.P. v. Dinesh Singh Chauhan,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_9_SCC_749\">\u00a0(2016) 9 SCC 749]<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Contract Act, 1872 \u2014 S. 28 (as amended in 1997) \u2014 Nature, and temporal operation of:<\/strong> S. 28 is substantive law and operates prospectively. Language used in S. 28 does not make it operative retrospectively. As it is remedial in nature, it is neither clarificatory or declaratory. [Union of India v. Indusind Bank Ltd.,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_9_SCC_720\">(2016) 9 SCC 720<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (25 of 1957) \u2014 Ss. 2(1)(t), 5-B and 6-B:<\/strong> Levy of sales tax on works contract, permissible only to the extent that there is a transfer of property in goods in execution of the works contract, which is deemed to be a \u201csale of goods\u201d to that extent exigible to sales tax. [Larsen &amp; Toubro Ltd. v. CCT,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_9_SCC_780\">\u00a0(2016) 9 SCC 780<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of the Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 \u2014 Ss. 2(a) &amp; (b), 3, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 18 r\/w Statement of Objects and Reasons:<\/strong> Acquisition of user rights in land for laying down pipelines and procedure therefor, held, valid. However, held, that though no eligibility is prescribed for competent authority under S. 2(a), Government must appoint a person who\u00a0is or has held a judicial office not lower in rank than a Subordinate Judge or is a trained legal mind. [Laljibhai Kadvabhai Savaliya v. State of Gujarat,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_9_SCC_791\"> (2016) 9 SCC 791<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 32 \u2014 Scope of interference under \u2014 Ex debito justitiae jurisdiction: Principle of ex debito justitiae is <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":102451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87421","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>2016 SCC Vol. 9 November 21, 2016 Part 5 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2016 SCC Vol. 9 November 21, 2016 Part 5\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 32 \u2014 Scope of interference under \u2014 Ex debito justitiae jurisdiction: Principle of ex debito justitiae is\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-11-26T11:44:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-07T10:44:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/\",\"name\":\"2016 SCC Vol. 9 November 21, 2016 Part 5 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-26T11:44:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-07T10:44:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2016 SCC Vol. 9 November 21, 2016 Part 5\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2016 SCC Vol. 9 November 21, 2016 Part 5 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2016 SCC Vol. 9 November 21, 2016 Part 5","og_description":"Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 32 \u2014 Scope of interference under \u2014 Ex debito justitiae jurisdiction: Principle of ex debito justitiae is","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-11-26T11:44:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-07T10:44:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/","name":"2016 SCC Vol. 9 November 21, 2016 Part 5 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","datePublished":"2016-11-26T11:44:47+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-07T10:44:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/26\/2016-scc-vol-9-november-21-2016-part-5\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2016 SCC Vol. 9 November 21, 2016 Part 5"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":65331,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/31\/life-convict-ashiq-hussain-faktoos-prayer-of-hearing-review-petition-in-an-open-court-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":87421,"position":0},"title":"Life convict Ashiq Hussain Faktoo\u2019s prayer of hearing review petition in an open court, dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 31, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Rejecting the prayer of release of the petitioner who was convicted under under Section 3 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA Act) and under Section 302 read with Section 120-B of the Penal Code, 1860, the 3-Judge Bench of Ranjan Gogoi, Prafulla C. Pant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276070,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/22\/right-to-information-right-to-privacy-ex-debito-justitiae-disclosure-of-confidential-and-sensitive-information-legal-news-legal-updates-supreme-court-hdfc\/","url_meta":{"origin":87421,"position":1},"title":"Right to Information vis-a-vis Right to Privacy; SC invokes doctrine of ex debito justitiae to hear HDFC&#8217;s plea challenging RBI directions mandating disclosure of confidential &amp; sensitive information","author":"Editor","date":"October 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf a man has been wronged, so long as the wrong lies within the human machinery of administration of justice, that wrong must be remedied.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/19\/2023-scc-vol-5-part-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":87421,"position":2},"title":"2023 SCC Vol. 5 Part 4","author":"Editor","date":"June 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 32, 14, 19 and 21 \u2014 Challenge to judgment of Supreme Court \u2014 Maintainability: Approach and duty of Court while determining maintainability of challenge to judgment of Supreme Court in the light of principle of ex debito justitiae vis-\u00e0-vis the principle of finality of issues\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2023 scc vol. 5 part 4","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/2023-scc-vol.-5-part-4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/2023-scc-vol.-5-part-4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/2023-scc-vol.-5-part-4.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/2023-scc-vol.-5-part-4.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234902,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/27\/bom-hc-can-a-wife-be-appointed-as-the-guardian-of-husband-who-is-in-a-state-of-comatose-or-vegetative-state-court-elaborates\/","url_meta":{"origin":87421,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | Can a wife be appointed as the guardian of husband who is in a state of comatose or vegetative state? Court elaborates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Ujjal Bhuyan and Milind N. Jadhav, JJ., while addressing an issue with regard to the appointment of a guardian for a person who is lying in the state of coma, held that, \"...the wife can be said to be best suited to be the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237437,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/14\/guj-hc-high-court-cannot-exercise-its-inherent-jurisdiction-to-quash-the-proceedings-unless-it-is-found-that-allegations-do-not-disclose-the-commission-of-cognizable-offence\/","url_meta":{"origin":87421,"position":4},"title":"Guj HC | High Court cannot exercise its inherent jurisdiction to quash the proceedings unless it is found that, allegations do not disclose the commission of cognizable offence","author":"Editor","date":"October 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: Ilesh J. Vohra, J., heard a matter related to offences alleged under Sections 376 (2) (n), 377, 406, 498(A), 323, 294(b), 506(2) and 114 of the Penal Code, 1860 and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act which was filed seeking to quash and set aside\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266258,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/30\/trial-framing-of-charge-delhi-high-court-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":87421,"position":5},"title":"Does framing of charge means that accused is guilty or does it imply that accused may be guilty? Del HC elaborates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Expressing that, the revisional jurisdiction is not meant to test the waters of what might happen in the trial, Chandra Dhari Singh, J., held that at the stage of framing of charge, the judge is merely required to overview the evidence in order to find out whether\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87421","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87421"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87421\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/102451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87421"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87421"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87421"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}