{"id":87231,"date":"2016-11-22T16:49:37","date_gmt":"2016-11-22T11:19:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=87231"},"modified":"2016-11-29T14:45:34","modified_gmt":"2016-11-29T09:15:34","slug":"issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/","title":{"rendered":"Courts in England and Wales, not bound by Privy Council decisions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court of United Kingdom:<\/strong> Considering the issue regarding the status of decisions by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) in the courts of England and Wales, a nine-Judge Bench headed by Lord Neuberger (President) unanimously specified the circumstances in which the JCPC can decide that the earlier House of Lords or Supreme Court decision was wrong. The Court held that unless there is a decision of a superior court to the contrary effect, a court in England and Wales can be expected to follow a decision of the JCPC, but there is no question of it being bound to do so as a matter of precedent. There is also no doubt that a court should not follow a decision of the JCPC, if it is inconsistent with the decision of another court which would otherwise be binding on it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present appeal came up before the Court in view of conflicting decisions of a House of Lords case of Gregory v. Portsmouth City Council, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/[2000]_1_A__C___419\">[2000] 1 AC 419<\/a>, and a JCPC case of Crawford Adjusters v. Sagicor General Insurance, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/[2014]_A__C_366\">[2014] AC 366<\/a>, on the issue that whether a claim in malicious prosecution could be brought in relation to civil proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Perusing the issue, the Court examined the hierarchy of the English Courts stating that on legal issues Circuit Judges are bound by decisions of High Court Judges, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court; High Court Judges are bound by decisions of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court; and the Court of Appeal is bound by decisions of the Supreme Court. it was observed that, \u201cIn a common law system the doctrine of precedent is fundamental. Decisions on points of law by more senior courts have to be accepted by more junior courts. Otherwise, the law becomes anarchic.\u201d The Court also highlighted an exception that if in an appeal to the JCPC that involves an issue of English law on which a previous decision of the House of Lords, Supreme Court or Court of Appeal is challenged, the members of the JCPC, if they think it appropriate can decide that the previous decision was wrong, and also can expressly direct that domestic courts should treat their decision as representing the law of England and Wales. [Willers v. Joyce,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/[2016]_3_WLR_534\"> [2016] 3 WLR 534<\/a> : [2016] UKSC 44, decided on 20.07.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of United Kingdom: Considering the issue regarding the status of decisions by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":56741,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[11291,11271,11281],"class_list":["post-87231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-house-of-lords","tag-judicial-precedents","tag-privy-council"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Courts in England and Wales, not bound by Privy Council decisions | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Courts in England and Wales, not bound by Privy Council decisions\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of United Kingdom: Considering the issue regarding the status of decisions by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-11-22T11:19:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-29T09:15:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1260\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"827\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/\",\"name\":\"Courts in England and Wales, not bound by Privy Council decisions | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-22T11:19:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-29T09:15:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg\",\"width\":1260,\"height\":827},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Courts in England and Wales, not bound by Privy Council decisions\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Courts in England and Wales, not bound by Privy Council decisions | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Courts in England and Wales, not bound by Privy Council decisions","og_description":"Supreme Court of United Kingdom: Considering the issue regarding the status of decisions by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC)","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-11-22T11:19:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-29T09:15:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1260,"height":827,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/","name":"Courts in England and Wales, not bound by Privy Council decisions | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg","datePublished":"2016-11-22T11:19:37+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-29T09:15:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg","width":1260,"height":827},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/22\/issues-regarding-status-of-decisions-by-judicial-committee-of-privy-council-in-courts-of-england-and-wales-clarified\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Courts in England and Wales, not bound by Privy Council decisions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":219952,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/24\/uk-sc-prime-ministers-advice-for-prorogation-of-parliament-declared-unlawful\/","url_meta":{"origin":87231,"position":0},"title":"UK SC | Prime Minister\u2019s advice for &#8220;Prorogation of Parliament&#8221; declared unlawful","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the United Kingdom: The 11-Judge Bench of Lady Hale (President) and Lord Reed (Deputy President), Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hodge, Lady Black, Lord Lloyd-Jones, lady Arden, Lord Kitchin and Lord Sales, while explaining the meaning of \u201cProrogation of Parliament\u201d held that the suspension of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294880,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/18\/illustrations-to-statutory-provisions-and-their-treatment-by-the-courts-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":87231,"position":1},"title":"Illustrations to Statutory Provisions and their Treatment by the Courts in India","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Dormaan Jamshid Dalal*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"illustrations to statutory provisions and their treatment","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/illustrations-to-statutory-provisions-and-their-treatment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/illustrations-to-statutory-provisions-and-their-treatment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/illustrations-to-statutory-provisions-and-their-treatment.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/illustrations-to-statutory-provisions-and-their-treatment.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237184,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/11\/special-leave-under-article-136-of-the-constitution-under-article-136-of-the-constitution-and-keeping-the-question-of-law-open\/","url_meta":{"origin":87231,"position":2},"title":"Special Leave under Article 136 of the Constitution and keeping the question of law open\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 11, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Dormaan Jamshid Dalal*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/constitution-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/constitution-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/constitution-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/constitution-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/constitution-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283340,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/07\/justice-kishan-kaul-asserts-that-supreme-court-cannot-be-immune-to-process-of-globalisation-legal-news-legal-research-updates-73-anniversary-supreme-court-india-justice-sundresh-menon-chief-justice-si\/","url_meta":{"origin":87231,"position":3},"title":"\u201cSupreme Court cannot be immune to globalisation. Since the nature of challenge is global, our response cannot afford to be local\u201d: Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul","author":"Editor","date":"February 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul stated that the Supreme Court is under intense scrutiny on a daily basis while emphasizing that functioning of the Apex court was always influenced by the dynamics of contemporary political forces, dominant economic realities and landmark social events.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-318.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":260001,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/it-is-duty-and-obligation-of-courts-to-go-on-with-matters-or-otherwise-it-would-tantamount-to-becoming-a-privy-to-the-strike\/","url_meta":{"origin":87231,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | It is duty and obligation of Courts to go on with matters or otherwise it would tantamount to becoming a privy to the strike; Court dismisses appeal","author":"Editor","date":"January 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Sujoy Paul, J. dealt and dismissed a petition while highlighting the increasing issues of strikes and boycotts by the lawyers. The petition was regarding a request to classify the petitioner as permanent employee in pursuance of Government Circular from the date of his entitlement and pay\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244056,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/carry-bags\/","url_meta":{"origin":87231,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Perception that non-compostable plastic are being passed off as compostable ones is not backed by research; HC uplifts the ban on compostable plastic bags","author":"Editor","date":"February 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A.K. Jaya Sankaran Nambiar, J., addressed an interesting case challenging the legality of government Order that banned the use of Compostable plastic carry bags. Facts in Brief The State, by invoking powers delegated to it by Central government under Environment Protection Act issued had an order banning\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87231"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87231\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/56741"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}