{"id":81791,"date":"2016-10-28T17:00:41","date_gmt":"2016-10-28T11:30:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=81791"},"modified":"2016-11-26T23:22:04","modified_gmt":"2016-11-26T17:52:04","slug":"2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00a02016 SCC Vol. 9 October 21, 2016 Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"

Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999 \u2014 Regn. 45-B:<\/strong> Regn. 45-B is not ultra vires the provisions contained in S. 26(9) of the 1998 Act and S. 62(4) of the 2003 Act. Fuel surcharge formula can be enacted by SERC, in absence of its provision in the statute. [Sai Bhaskar Iron Ltd. v. A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission, (2016) 9 SCC 134<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Companies Act, 1956 \u2014 Ss. 446(2), 443 and 529-A:<\/strong> Any transaction in violation of Company Court conditional leave order on application filed by creditor Bank in pending winding-up petition, for Bank to proceed with DRT proceedings, liable to be set aside. [Anita International v. Tungabadra Sugar Works Mazdoor Sangh,\u00a0(2016) 9 SCC 44<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 323-A and 323-B \u2014 Tribunals:<\/strong> Constitution and functioning of: Considering the nature of disputes adjudicated upon by tribunals, their constitution, tenure of members, venue\/location of tribunals, bypassing of High Courts and the pendency of litigation before the Supreme Court; Law Commission directed to examine: (i) necessity to bring changes in the statutory framework constituting various tribunals with regard to persons appointed, manner of appointment, duration of appointment, etc. (ii) providing of appeals routinely to Supreme Court on a question of law or substantial question of law which is not of national or public importance (iii) bypassing of the High Courts from the orders of Tribunal (iv) exclusion of jurisdiction of all courts in the absence of equally effective alternative mechanism for access to justice at grass root level. [Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Essar Power Ltd.,\u00a0(2016) 9 SCC 103<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 \u2014 Ss. 174, 154, 175, 173, 157, 482 and 397 \u2014 Inquiry under S. 174 \u2014 Ambit and scope of:<\/strong> In this case of bride committing suicide by hanging in her matrimonial home within 5 months of marriage, inquiry which was conducted for purpose of ascertaining whether death is natural or unnatural cannot be categorised under information relating to commission of cognizable offence within meaning and import of S. 154 CrPC. On information received, police made inquiry as contemplated under S. 174 CrPC and submitted its report before SDM, stating that it was a case of hanging and no cognizable offence was found to have been committed. In the report, it was also mentioned that father of deceased does not want to take any further action in the matter. It clearly goes to show that what was undertaken by police was inquiry under S. 174 CrPC which was limited to the extent of natural or unnatural death and the case was closed. Whereas, condition precedent for recording of FIR is, that there must be an information and that information must disclose a cognizable offence. Herein, undoubtedly, intimation was information of nature contemplated under S. 174 CrPC and it could not be categorised as information disclosing a cognizable offence. Also, there is no material to show, that police after conducting investigation, submitted a report under S. 173 CrPC as contemplated, before the competent authority, which accepted the said report and closed the case. Hence, investigation on inquiry under S. 174 is distinct from investigation as contemplated under S. 154 relating to commission of a cognizable offence and, herein, there was no FIR registered on the date of incident and neither any investigation nor any report under S. 173 was submitted. Therefore, challenge to impugned FIR registered after 5 years, cannot be assailed on ground that it was second FIR in garb of which investigation or fresh investigation of same incident was initiated. [Manoj Kumar Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh,\u00a0(2016) 9 SCC 1<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Service Law \u2014 Departmental Enquiry \u2014 Initiation of departmental enquiry \u2014 After retirement:<\/strong> If manner of doing particular act is prescribed under any statute, then act must be done in that manner or not at all. Further, Division Bench erred in holding that once due sanction was obtained by disciplinary authority from President of India, then bar of limitation of four years before institution of disciplinary proceedings contained in R. 9(2)(b)(ii) would not apply, since sanction accorded itself was barred by limitation. Impugned judgment upholding decision of respondents to hold departmental enquiry against appellant, is unsustainable. [Brajendra Singh Yambem v. Union of India, \u00a0(2016) 9 SCC 20<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999 \u2014 Regn. 45-B: Regn. 45-B is not ultra vires the provisions contained <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":102451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-81791","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases"],"yoast_head":"\n\u00a02016 SCC Vol. 9 October 21, 2016 Part 1 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u00a02016 SCC Vol. 9 October 21, 2016 Part 1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999 \u2014 Regn. 45-B: Regn. 45-B is not ultra vires the provisions contained\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-10-28T11:30:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-26T17:52:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/\",\"name\":\"\u00a02016 SCC Vol. 9 October 21, 2016 Part 1 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-10-28T11:30:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-26T17:52:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u00a02016 SCC Vol. 9 October 21, 2016 Part 1\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u00a02016 SCC Vol. 9 October 21, 2016 Part 1 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u00a02016 SCC Vol. 9 October 21, 2016 Part 1","og_description":"Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999 \u2014 Regn. 45-B: Regn. 45-B is not ultra vires the provisions contained","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-10-28T11:30:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-26T17:52:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/","name":"\u00a02016 SCC Vol. 9 October 21, 2016 Part 1 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","datePublished":"2016-10-28T11:30:41+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-26T17:52:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/28\/2016-scc-vol-9-october-21-2016-part-1\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u00a02016 SCC Vol. 9 October 21, 2016 Part 1"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":288676,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/writ-petition-new-electricity-connection-allowed-appeal-past-dues-pending-calcutta-high-court-denied-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":81791,"position":0},"title":"New owners not liable for past dues and entitled to new connections despite refusal to pay, if nexus is not proved: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court observed that no sum due will be recoverable from any consumer after a period of two years from the date when such sum first became due unless such sum was shown continuously recoverable as arrears of charges of electricity supply.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":91431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/13\/2016-scc-vol-10-december-7-2016-part-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":81791,"position":1},"title":"2016 SCC Vol. 10 December 7, 2016 Part 2","author":"Saba","date":"December 13, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Associations, Societies and Clubs \u2014 Body discharging public functions but not amounting to \u201cState\u201d \u2014 BCCI: Due to obstructionist and defiant attitude of BCCI towards reform of BCCI and supervision of transition by Court appointed Committee, as suggested by Justice Lodha Committee and affirmed in Cricket Assn. of Bihar, (2016)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255703,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/16\/2021-scc-vol-6-part-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":81791,"position":2},"title":"2021 SCC Vol. 6 Part 4","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 \u2014 S. 439 \u2014 Bail: In this case, application for bail, by petitioner accused, a sitting MP was rejected by Single Judge of High Court. Custodial torture of petitioner was alleged before Division Bench of High Court which directed his medical examination. Both aforesaid orders were\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":43601,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/13\/2016-scc-vol-3-march-28-2016-part-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":81791,"position":3},"title":"2016 SCC Vol. 3 March 28, 2016 Part 3","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 13, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 22(5), 14, 19 and 21 \u2014 Detention order and its grounds vis-\u00e1-vis order of Advisory Board\/competent authority rejecting representation of detenu: Manner in which said orders should comply with Art. 22. Detention order and its grounds have to be communicated at the earliest as mandated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":69181,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/13\/2016-scc-vol-7-september-7-2016-part-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":81791,"position":4},"title":"2016 SCC Vol. 7 September 7, 2016 Part 5","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 13, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 136 and 145(3): Reference to Constitution Bench to restrict scope of Art. 136, dismissed. Even if a large number of cases is pending, no effort should be made to restrict scope of Art. 136. In Interest of Justice it Would be better to use said\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225670,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/2020-scc-vol-2-february-7-2020-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":81791,"position":5},"title":"2020 SCC Vol. 2 February 7, 2020 Part 1","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 137, 142, 145(3), 25 and 26 \u2014 Scope of review jurisdiction: In review petitions and writ petitions questioning judgments of majority Judges in Sabarimala Temple, (2019) 11 SCC 1, having regard to the issues raised, the recurring issues pertaining to rights flowing from Arts. 25\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81791"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81791\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/102451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}