{"id":80161,"date":"2016-10-20T11:31:01","date_gmt":"2016-10-20T06:01:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=80161"},"modified":"2016-11-29T10:30:21","modified_gmt":"2016-11-29T05:00:21","slug":"order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/","title":{"rendered":"Order to arrest officials of a Construction Company for failing to hand over flat or make refunds, upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"

National \u00a0Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission:\u00a0<\/strong>While dismissing an execution appeal filed by a construction company, NCDRC upheld the order of the Punjab State Consumer Commission, vide which the Commission had directed arrest of the officials of the Construction Company for failing to hand over flats or make refunds on time. Earlier, in this case of failure of Construction Company in delivering the flat on time or to refund the amount to the complainants, the State Commission directed the Company to refund the amount along with Rs. 25, 000 as cost of litigation. Thereafter, an execution application was filed in the matter before State Commission. While hearing the execution application, State Commission declared the director and general manager of the company as proclaimed offenders as in spite of the proclamation published against them under Section 82 CrPC, they did not appear before the State Commission. State Commission also rejected a miscellaneous application in which the appellants stated that they should be allowed to settle the entire amount awarded against them by way of allotment of flat, equivalent to the value of the amount awarded, or they should be allowed to pay the decree amount in monthly instalments of Rs. 50,000 each, till payment of the entire amount. State Commission noted that the offer so made in the application was not acceptable to the complainants.<\/p>\n

After perusal of material on record and hearing both the parties, the National Commission noted, \u201cUnder the Consumer Protection Act, the compliance of the order passed by the consumer fora is made by following procedure under Section 25 or Section 27 of the said Act. It is not for the judgement-debtor to choose, which manner of execution is to be followed. It was the duty of the judgment-debtor, therefore, to put in appearance before the State Commission and state their view point before them. There is no merit in the present appeal therefore, and the same is ordered to be dismissed in limine.\u201d [Nitishree Infrastructure Ltd.<\/em> v. Inderdeep Singh<\/em>, 2016 SCC OnLine NCDRC 1421<\/a>, decided on October 5, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National \u00a0Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission:\u00a0While dismissing an execution appeal filed by a construction company, NCDRC upheld the order of the Punjab State <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":199533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-80161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies"],"yoast_head":"\nOrder to arrest officials of a Construction Company for failing to hand over flat or make refunds, upheld | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Order to arrest officials of a Construction Company for failing to hand over flat or make refunds, upheld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National \u00a0Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission:\u00a0While dismissing an execution appeal filed by a construction company, NCDRC upheld the order of the Punjab State\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-10-20T06:01:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-29T05:00:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/\",\"name\":\"Order to arrest officials of a Construction Company for failing to hand over flat or make refunds, upheld | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-10-20T06:01:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-29T05:00:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Order to arrest officials of a Construction Company for failing to hand over flat or make refunds, upheld\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Order to arrest officials of a Construction Company for failing to hand over flat or make refunds, upheld | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Order to arrest officials of a Construction Company for failing to hand over flat or make refunds, upheld","og_description":"National \u00a0Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission:\u00a0While dismissing an execution appeal filed by a construction company, NCDRC upheld the order of the Punjab State","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-10-20T06:01:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-29T05:00:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/","name":"Order to arrest officials of a Construction Company for failing to hand over flat or make refunds, upheld | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","datePublished":"2016-10-20T06:01:01+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-29T05:00:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/order-to-arrest-officials-of-a-construction-company-for-failing-to-hand-over-flat-or-make-refunds-upheld\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Order to arrest officials of a Construction Company for failing to hand over flat or make refunds, upheld"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":219505,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/13\/ncdrc-buyers-cannot-be-made-to-wait-indefinitely-for-possession-of-apartment-in-case-of-incomplete-construction-developer-to-refund-the-amount-paid\/","url_meta":{"origin":80161,"position":0},"title":"NCDRC | Buyers cannot be made to wait indefinitely for possession of\u00a0apartment in case of incomplete construction; ‘Developer’ to refund the amount paid","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumers Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): The Bench comprising of Justice R.K. Agrawal (President) and M. Shreesha (Member) while addressing a complaint filed under the Consumer Protection Act stated that: \u201cComplainants cannot be made to wait indefinitely for possession of the unit, as the construction is yet to be completed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301409,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/ncdrc-directs-developers-hand-over-possession-or-refund-sum-of-1-crore-home-buyer\/","url_meta":{"origin":80161,"position":1},"title":"NCDRC directs developers to hand over possession of flat or refund sum of 1 crore to a buyer","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCDRC remarked that the argument of dissolution of joint venture agreement relieving obligations of one of the opposite parties was misconceived and could not be accepted.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national consumer disputes redressal commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":381124,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/ncdrc-ansal-hitech-township-director-liability-section-72-consumer-protection-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":80161,"position":2},"title":"NCDRC Holds Ansal Hi-Tech Township Directors Liable for Wilful Non-Compliance of Consumer Court Order","author":"Aastha","date":"April 15, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe corporate structure of Parent and Subsidiary company being two different legal entitles is being misused to avoid satisfaction of decrees in the present cases. Hence, we hold that DH(s) in the present cases have been successful in making a case for lifting the corporate veil between the JD Company\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Ansal Hi-Tech Consumer Case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Ansal-Hi-Tech-Consumer-Case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Ansal-Hi-Tech-Consumer-Case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Ansal-Hi-Tech-Consumer-Case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Ansal-Hi-Tech-Consumer-Case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332775,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/consumer-commissions-has-power-to-act-as-jm-includes-power-to-issue-arrest-warrants-dhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":80161,"position":3},"title":"Consumer Commissions have power to act as Judicial Magistrate for trial of offences, which includes power to issue arrest warrants: Delhi HC","author":"Arushi","date":"October 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The question here is not about past wrongs, it is about the present failure to comply with a legally binding order. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is explicit on this point, that those in charge of a company during non-compliance are accountable. By holding a directorial position during this period,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256639,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/law-on-builder-buyer-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":80161,"position":4},"title":"Law on Builder-Buyer Dispute | 9-years delay in delivering possession of apartment: Read NCDRC\u2019s decision on refund and interest","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Can Buyer be asked to wait indefinitely for possession of flat even after 9-years of delay?","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203371,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/10\/even-a-single-default-in-payment-can-be-a-ground-for-canceling-the-allotment-of-a-property-in-a-case-where-the-developer-is-a-private-company\/","url_meta":{"origin":80161,"position":5},"title":"Even a single default in payment can be a ground for cancelling the allotment of a property in a case where the developer is a private company","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Single Member Bench of V.K. Jain, J., allowed an appeal filed against the order of the State Commission. The respondent was allotted a flat in a project which was to be developed by the appellant company. The respondent paid more than 50% of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80161"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80161\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/199533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}